"Oz1" wrote in message ...
Were there any after the invasion of Afghanistan?
So why Iraq?

Pre-emptive attack, stupid. It is better to prevent than
to attempt to retaliate after the fact.


Hmm you _still_ don't get it!
Your Govt lied and manufactured 'facts' to pursue its agenda.

Wrong. That is your opinion. That does not make it fact. Our
government does not need to manufacture anything. It needed
only to enforce UN resolution 1441.

IIRC the UN was against invasion because they saw no "imminent threat"
nor evidence of WMD. Blix was pilloried by the US for stating fact and
not supporting a scenario based on fiction.

You need to re-read UN Resolution 1441 before you attempt
to revise history. There are those of who will not allow such
cheap tricks. You should only live to realize how stupid you
and your whining ilk really appear.