"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
They have forgotten
that Democrats and Republicans in congress agreed
wholeheartedly that the war in Iraq was necessary. They
were all privy to the same intelligence as was President
Bush. Hmmmmm!

Really?
Does this mean that all members of Congress had access to the highly
sensitive intelligence that Bush saw? .. OR does it mean that Bush didn't
have access to the source material?


I find it very difficult to believe that all the Members of Congress could
be either as dishonest, or as stupid as Bush. I think that you must be
mistaken.



Regards


Donal
--

"Donal" wrote in message ...

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
They have forgotten
that Democrats and Republicans in congress agreed
wholeheartedly that the war in Iraq was necessary. They
were all privy to the same intelligence as was President
Bush. Hmmmmm!

Really?
Does this mean that all members of Congress had access to the highly
sensitive intelligence that Bush saw? .. OR does it mean that Bush didn't
have access to the source material?

It means that those in Congress with Top Secret security clearance
did, indeed, have access to the same classified info as did the President.
These cleared persons were free to 'advise and direct' the less senior members
of congress. There was never any talk of bogus intelligence until lately.
It is just more of the same old political trash talking that is par for
the course.

I find it very difficult to believe that all the Members of Congress could
be either as dishonest, or as stupid as Bush. I think that you must be
mistaken.

You have demonstrated time and time again that you don't have
a decent grasp on reality and won't believe the truth even when
your face is rubbed in it. BTW, I am never mistaken.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...



"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
They have forgotten
that Democrats and Republicans in congress agreed
wholeheartedly that the war in Iraq was necessary. They
were all privy to the same intelligence as was President
Bush. Hmmmmm!

Really?
Does this mean that all members of Congress had access to the highly
sensitive intelligence that Bush saw? .. OR does it mean that Bush
didn't
have access to the source material?

It means that those in Congress with Top Secret security clearance
did, indeed, have access to the same classified info as did the President.

Oh for Gawd's sake! Don't be so stupid. That isn't how security works.

Think about the phrase "need to know".

"Top Security" is NOT the highest classification! Even if you have the
highest possible clearance, you still only get the info that you "need to
know".

It is patently obvious that you know nothing about this subject. I think
that you have watched too many James Bond movies, and you believe that "Top
Security" means that you get access to all secret info. You are an idiot!


These cleared persons were free to 'advise and direct' the less senior
members
of congress. There was never any talk of bogus intelligence until lately.

Rubbish! There was talk of bogus intelligence before the war started.
*You* chose not to see it.


It is just more of the same old political trash talking that is par for
the course.

I find it very difficult to believe that all the Members of Congress
could
be either as dishonest, or as stupid as Bush. I think that you must
be
mistaken.

You have demonstrated time and time again that you don't have
a decent grasp on reality and won't believe the truth even when
your face is rubbed in it. BTW, I am never mistaken.


You are never mistaken .... hmmmmm. Do you still believe that Iraq had
WMD?




Regards


Donal
--

Anybody who thinks Iraq did NOT have WMDs is such
an ignorant fool that he needs to be bitch-slapped into
reality.


"Donal" wrote in message ...

You are never mistaken .... hmmmmm. Do you still believe that Iraq had
WMD?

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

Anybody who thinks Iraq did NOT have WMDs is such
an ignorant fool that he needs to be bitch-slapped into
reality.


"Donal" wrote in message
...

You are never mistaken .... hmmmmm. Do you still believe that Iraq
had
WMD?



Well go on ...... bitch-slap me with some facts!

You can't, can you?


Let me bitch-slap a bit of reality into *you*. Iraq did NOT have WMD.
Iraq did NOT pose a clear and imminent threat to our security.
Iraq did NOT have any links with 9/11 OR with Al'Quaeda.
Saddam was not a very nice man, but so what?


Regards


Donal
--

I do not choose to present you with any facts other than
time will prove you the fool and do a better job at it than
you, youself, have done and THAT'S saying something.


"Donal" wrote in message ...

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

Anybody who thinks Iraq did NOT have WMDs is such
an ignorant fool that he needs to be bitch-slapped into
reality.


"Donal" wrote in message
...

You are never mistaken .... hmmmmm. Do you still believe that Iraq
had
WMD?



Well go on ...... bitch-slap me with some facts!

You can't, can you?


Let me bitch-slap a bit of reality into *you*. Iraq did NOT have WMD.
Iraq did NOT pose a clear and imminent threat to our security.
Iraq did NOT have any links with 9/11 OR with Al'Quaeda.
Saddam was not a very nice man, but so what?


Regards


Donal
--

"Donal"
Well go on ...... bitch-slap me with some facts!

You can't, can you?

Let me bitch-slap a bit of reality into *you*. Iraq did NOT have WMD.
Iraq did NOT pose a clear and imminent threat to our security.
Iraq did NOT have any links with 9/11 OR with Al'Quaeda.
Saddam was not a very nice man, but so what?

Fer crissakes, Donal, you sound like a broken record. When will you just
accept reality and acknowledge that your conventions just don't always apply.
There just are some words that use a Q without following it with a U.

"SkitchNYC" wrote in message
...
"Donal"
Well go on ...... bitch-slap me with some facts!

You can't, can you?

Let me bitch-slap a bit of reality into *you*. Iraq did NOT have WMD.
Iraq did NOT pose a clear and imminent threat to our security.
Iraq did NOT have any links with 9/11 OR with Al'Quaeda.
Saddam was not a very nice man, but so what?

Fer crissakes, Donal, you sound like a broken record. When will you just
accept reality and acknowledge that your conventions just don't always
apply.
There just are some words that use a Q without following it with a U.

Sorry! As a special favour to you, I will take more care with my spelling.


Regards

Donal
--

Bush wouldn't lie, he knows it only makes things worse and feeds his rabid
enemies.
Face it, Hussien is gone there's nothing you can do to bring him back.
I'd rather have the Americans running the show than Hussien. The Americans
are even going to be kind enough to invite the UN (Bozo's circus) in to
help. Now the UN inspection teams can search high and low for the WMD.
The Iraq situation will be resolved no matter how hard you try to sabotage
it. The world will move on regardless.
America may not be perfect, but at least they do a good job of giving
widging pommies something to widge about. So fix your own country first you
foreigner! Or should we come over there and straighten yours out too?





"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
They have forgotten
that Democrats and Republicans in congress agreed
wholeheartedly that the war in Iraq was necessary. They
were all privy to the same intelligence as was President
Bush. Hmmmmm!

Really?
Does this mean that all members of Congress had access to the highly
sensitive intelligence that Bush saw? .. OR does it mean that Bush didn't
have access to the source material?


I find it very difficult to believe that all the Members of Congress could
be either as dishonest, or as stupid as Bush. I think that you must be
mistaken.



Regards


Donal
--

Face it, Hussien is gone there's nothing you can do to bring him back.

Where'd he go? Seems to be doing fine, directing attacks and killing Americans
EVERY DAY. Nice job, mister Bush.

RB