That is one very true and descriptive article. Too bad idiots
like Bobsprit, for example, will not even bother reading more
than one paragraph before they reject it and continue with their
sedition.


"Anonymous Sender" wrote in message
acolo.com...
The Party of Sabotage
By David Horowitz
FrontPageMagazine.com - July 21, 2003

From September to March, the Democratic Party played the classic role
of appeasers, seeking every excuse possible not to call Saddam
Hussein's bluff or call him to account for his defiance of
international agreements. This was no different from the role Neville
Chamberlain carved out in the 1930s as Hitler defied one international
arms control agreement after another on his march to war. Their
appeasement threatened to undermine the international security order,
and would have done so if George Bush had buckled to their pressures.

In the 1930s, the Communist left also organized a "peace" movement to
protest American, British and French "militarism" and keep the Western
powers from arming to stop Hitler. Their agenda was to protect Stalin
and to put pressure on the appeasers to rely on negotiation and other
failed measures. The Communists' peace organization was called the
World Congress Against Imperialist War. Its American version was the
Committee for the World Congress Against War (note the ellision
of "Imperialist" to make the sell to the fellow travelers easy). It was
led by the Susan Sarandons and Susan Sontags of the day -- literary
icons like Sherwood Anderson and Theodore Dreiser who were willing
tools of Stalin's designs.

As the Iraq war approached, this magazine warned that the neo-communist
left was making plans to move to the next stage of "resistance" and
sabotage the war effort. The left did, in fact, organize law-breaking
demonstrations in downtown business centers that would have made al-
Qaeda's work easy (by tying up Homeland Security personnel) if the war
had not been brought to a swift and happy conclusion by the forces Bush
and Rumsfeld set in motion. Since the left's own war with America is
permanent, they have now turned their efforts to undermining the peace
and specifically America's efforts to reshape the Middle East and make
it a less safe harbor for our terrorist enemies.

Unfortunately, the Democratic Party has followed suit in its own timid
way, shedding the mantle of appeasement to become the party of
sabotage. Not a day has gone by since American forces liberated Iraq
that Democrats have not attempted to undermine the leadership that
brought about the victory. The greatest triumph of American policy
since the end of the Cold War has become the unending target of
Democratic snipers -- among them all its presidential nominees and its
chief congressional spokesmen .

The war cost too much; the rationale for the war was deceptive; the
President is liar.

We want congressional investigations to tie up the Administration,
distract it from its war tasks, and encourage our enemies.

No act of Democratic perfidy has been more disgraceful than Dick
Gephardt's statement in Iowa -- echoed by other Democratic figures --
that the President's credibility was a crucial element of the nation's
security and that this President had lied.

It was a disgrace on many counts. It was a lie to say that this
President had lied. The famous statement about Niger uranium was in
fact a statement about a British intelligence report concerning Niger
uranium. The statement about British intelligence was true. The British
are still supporting their report. The attacks on the statement are
political sabotage of the commander-in-chief. In time of war.

Second, the same Dick Gephardt and the other Democratic hypocrites,
without exception, went to the wall to defend Bill Clinton's lies about
war and peace, to shield him from any inquiry into his missile strikes
in the Sudan and in other countries -- strikes that were unauthorized
and where the entire premise of the strikes was proven to be false.What
Democrat manifested concern about the national security implications of
Clinton's credibility during the Lewinsky mess? Which one of them
cooperated with the congressional investigations (conducted in advance
of any war) into the massive illegal funding of the Clinton campaign by
agents of the Chinese military and intelligence services, or into the
lax security policies that resulted in China's theft of our entire
nuclear arsenal? The answer is none did. America's national security is
the lowest priority on the Democratic Party agenda. In this, Ann
Coulter is absolutely right.

For the record, the United States did not go to war with Iraq because
Iraq made a uranium deal with Niger or because Iraq did or did not have
weapons of mass destruction. It went to war with Iraq to implement UN
resolution 1441 -- as authorized by a unanimous vote of the UN Security
Council and for the reasons stated by Democratic Senator Bob Graham who
is now one of the President's chief and most unprincipled attackers.

This what Graham said on Fox News Sunday (6/23/04): "What we're
concerned about with Iraq is its intention and capabilities to develop
weapons of mass destruction, and the merger of that capability with
terrorist groups, that is the ultimate nightmare scenario."

What the Democratic Party is doing now is sabotaging the war on terror.
The securing of Iraq -- which borders two terrorist states (Syria and
Iran) -- is absolutely crucial for everything that will follow,
including the stabilization of the Middle East and the disarming of
Islamic terrorists.

It is a national tragedy that in this hour of national crisis the
Democratic Party does not have a single statesman who might follow the
example of Tony Blair and stand up to the saboteurs and speak out for a
bi-partisan front against those who have sworn to destroy us. That
Democrats are not rallying around the President in its efforts to carry
on the work of peace is an unforgiveable betrayal.

This is the final destructive legacy of the narcissistic and feckless
leadership of Carter, Clinton and Gore. It is they who set the bad
example in the first place. And it is they who have never really shed
the McGovern delusion that in the final analysis America is the root
cause of all the root causes that inspire our enemies to attack us.

not even bother reading more
than one paragraph before they reject it and continue with their
sedition.


Another US soldier dead today, thanks to Bush.
Not acceptable.

RB

"CANDChelp" wrote in message ...
not even bother reading more
than one paragraph before they reject it and continue with their
sedition.


Another US soldier dead today, thanks to terrorists

I agree. We need to continue the war against terrorism.

Another US soldier dead today, thanks to terrorists

I agree. We need to continue the war against terrorism.

The terrorists kills US soldiers because Bush allows it.
Not one more American life need be lost. It's not acceptable.

RB

More people die in automobile accidents in NYC daily than
soldiers in Iraq. If you are so unaccepting of death why do
you continue to drive a lethal machine?

Can you say 'hypocrite'?


"CANDChelp" wrote in message ...
Another US soldier dead today, thanks to terrorists

I agree. We need to continue the war against terrorism.

The terrorists kills US soldiers because Bush allows it.
Not one more American life need be lost. It's not acceptable.

RB

More people die in automobile accidents in NYC daily than
soldiers in Iraq.

That doesn't mean that preventable murders by Bush should continue.
He's killing Americans by his actions.

RB

Why are you changing the subject? Have you run out of argument?
"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
More people die in automobile accidents in NYC daily than
soldiers in Iraq. If you are so unaccepting of death why do
you continue to drive a lethal machine?

Can you say 'hypocrite'?


"CANDChelp" wrote in message
...
Another US soldier dead today, thanks to terrorists

I agree. We need to continue the war against terrorism.

The terrorists kills US soldiers because Bush allows it.
Not one more American life need be lost. It's not acceptable.

RB