I'll post the pic. His old Cal is right next to me, owned by another lawyer.

yea, that'll prove it. Bob, the presumption here is that anything your write
is a lie. It is up to you to prove it is true. All you have to do is answer
some of the questions I've asked. Your failure to do so, just burns the brand
of the liar in a little deeper.

I have no reason to lie. In my career I am obliged to know all the top AOLTW
lawyers (this is no brag, I could be the exec floor shoe shine guy). It stands
to reason that I know your man, if he can buy any boat he wants. So, give me a
little to go on, and I will call him if I know him and put in a good word for
you. Maybe he'll let you crew for him.

I'll post the pic. His old Cal is right next to me, owned by another lawyer.

yea, that'll prove it.

It's more proof than you've ever provided on any single point. Posting the
guy's name means nothing and wouldn't be right either. Posting a pic of his
boat is harmless and offers some proof. The only REAL proof would be for your
to meet the fellow, but you'd have to show some courage for that one. Instead,
you'll call me a liar from a safe distance, ignoring the offer of proof. That's
your only refuge, Skitchy!

RB

So, we've established that he's not a top honcho
and is looking for a 300-400k boat.

Again, I only know he can afford this. Perhaps he "could" afford more. I simply
don't know.
Again, you've lost sight of the thread. Do you have anything useful to add to
the original topic?

RB

Thus, we have a mid-level lawyer who keeps his boat at City Island and is
scraping pennies to buy a larger one. A far cry from your first
characterization.

Skitchy, nobody who can spend 300-400K on a boat is midlevel anything. Very few
laywers have that kind of scratch for a toy. I don't think you know what the
average entertainment lawyer makes.

RB