Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() She doesn't "deserve" squat! She is entitled to royalties on those books she sells. That's all! Anybody who can figure out how to share his book has every right to. The same goes for music. If an artist (these days that's a very loose term) sells CDs then he is entitled to a percentage of the proceeds. He does not deserve one red cent for those electronic copies produced elsewhere or distributed over the net. If you buy a cake at the store are you forbidden to share it with all your friends. Do the cake makers insist every individual who eats a piece of their cake pay a royalty? "katysails" wrote in message ... Only a putz buys books and music in this day and age. Then I'm really glad I'm a putz since she deserves the royalties for her work...and you are highly unethical and immoral...but hen, we all knew that... -- katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit. http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation | General | |||
Flogging a Dead Horse (on topic) | General | |||
Bush Exploits Photo of Dead Bodies | General |