On 12 Jul 2003 16:11:24 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

i'm not sure that
there's anybody on this group who knows quite how easy it would
be to "lose" a heap of things in a decent-sized deserts

According to Bush and his people, a great deal of the materials were in
populated areas which are well watched. Where are they now? Where are the
warheads? Where are the millions of gallons of nerve agents?

Buried under rose bushes. Obviously.





Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Beers!

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ...
I think we should ban cars.

I would really love to see that happen. Get rid of all privately
owned ground vehicles and build some real mass transportation.

How about some fast trains, some people-mover sidewalks,
fancy busses with bars built in, decent subways, etc. It would
be a vast improvement over the present system of mass
congestion and pollution.

You call protecting ourselves against future 911 attacks
political? Duh!

That money would have been far better spent on "protection" here. Saddam lacked
the ability to launch any kind of attack against us from Iraq. He STILL has the
ability to launch small, but deadly terrorist attacks, just as before. We need
the money spent here, on our own ground, for security. Bush made the US a
muslim enemy. He has given them strength and even worse, RESOLVE against us.
He (and you) do NOT understand the enemy and think cowboy antics will win.
All moneys should be focused on better, more advanced security here. Period.

RB

Bush talks tough for someone who is not in the war zone. What a total
chicken**** ****up!

And you are where? talking what?

He's at home, paying his taxes, like a good citizen should unless called into
action. Meanwhile, his dopey president is misspending his tax money against his
wishes and killing his fellow american brother.

RB

first get rid of power boats.
--
Scott Vernon
Plowville PA __/)__/)__

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
I think we should ban cars.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...


You people just don't get it do you? What a bunch of simpering
wimps and morons you all are!

First off, you have proven that no matter the scenario you will
complain so what's the use of hurrying to attempt to please you
or answer your questions and cater to your whims?

If we find WMDs you will claim they were planted.
If we don't find WMDs you will say they never existed.

When former and impeached President Clinton said there
were WMDs you agreed even though Clinton was convicted
of perjury ("lying under oath", for those of you living in New York)
When President Bush says there were WMDs you yell, "Liar".
even when there is not one single solitary proven example of
Mr. Bush having lied.

If we don't find WMDs fast enough to meet with your approval
you claim they don't exist. If we find 100 pounds of uranium
or anthrax you will say that isn't enough. You say mobile
weapons labs mean nothing. You say centrifuges to enrich
uranium don't count. You say the specialized aluminum tubes
to hold centrifuge contents don't count. You say uranium itself
doesn't mean anything. You say precursors to biologicals don't
count. You say elevated levels of chemical weapons in the rivers
don't count. You say gassed Kurds don't count.

Even if we found a million pounds of chemical and biologicals
you will still say it's a lie because the quantity is too great.

If we take your whining and complaining and stick it right up your
ass you will say it was rape. If we ask your permission to do so
beforehand you will say OK but then you will whine and complain
that you did not have all necessary information as to the consequences
and it really hurt and we should have given you more facts. If we
spent two weeks giving you all the facts you would complain we
are taking up too much of your time giving you the facts.

Fact the facts, you are chronic compainers and nothing else but.

You say you support the troops but you constantly disparage
their efforts and their sacrifice. You continue to undermine
their morale and you continue to endanger their lives with
your idiotic criticism of their Commander in Chief. You say
you love our country but you hate it's leaders. You are too
stupid to realize the two are inseparable.

Why would you actually think anyone regards you and all
liberals as other than anti-American, whining, complaining,
nagging assholes who take a negative stand on every issue
and NEVER, NEVER EVER offer anything constructive?



"Thomas Stewart" wrote in message
...
FT,

I'm kind of like you Tad, but Nutsy does make some pretty strong
points.
The points he makes, about they were never there shouldn't be that
hard
to disprove. After all, we did go to war being assure there was proof
of
their existence. If there was proof, I would like to see it. Even if
it
was wrong, let's see what was thought to be WMD. I would like to see
what it was that caused us to spend Billions of taxpayers money and
justified the killing that took place and is taking place right now.

Shutting up about it has got to be wrong! Prove there was a reason to
take control of another country ( Other than Oil!) I also woul like
to
see a little more effort to find Saddam, also Bin Laden. Let's be
informed of what is being done.

I want to believe. I did truly believe, as this group can attest to,
in
the beginning. Now, the Admin. is admitting to lying. I damn well
don't
like it

The Party in power made a big thing about Clinton getting Blowjobs but
no one was killed and it didn't cost the country a tenth of what these
lies are costing us

Ole Thom

Keep 'em in the fields and barn and it will be OK.

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message ...
but we can keep our tractors, right?
--
Scott Vernon
Plowville PA __/)__/)__


"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
I think we should ban cars.

I would really love to see that happen. Get rid of all privately
owned ground vehicles and build some real mass transportation.

How about some fast trains, some people-mover sidewalks,
fancy busses with bars built in, decent subways, etc. It would
be a vast improvement over the present system of mass
congestion and pollution.

how do we get to the supply store then?

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...


Keep 'em in the fields and barn and it will be OK.

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
but we can keep our tractors, right?
--
Scott Vernon
Plowville PA __/)__/)__


"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
I think we should ban cars.

I would really love to see that happen. Get rid of all privately
owned ground vehicles and build some real mass transportation.

How about some fast trains, some people-mover sidewalks,
fancy busses with bars built in, decent subways, etc. It would
be a vast improvement over the present system of mass
congestion and pollution.

I fail to see how something as sensible as getting rid of
cars and all the pollution and inefficiency they cause can
be called liberalism.

There is nothing in the Constitution that guarantees the
right to own and operate automobiles.



"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ...
Sounds like the liberal agenda to me. This is what you're
promoting?

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
I think we should ban cars.

I would really love to see that happen. Get rid of all privately
owned ground vehicles and build some real mass transportation.

How about some fast trains, some people-mover sidewalks,
fancy busses with bars built in, decent subways, etc. It would
be a vast improvement over the present system of mass
congestion and pollution.

Well, I certainly agree with you, but this flies in the face
of big oil and the Republican agenda for America. If you
can justify it, I'm certainly not going to argue with you
about it. I'm sure you'd find much agreement in the liberal
community, especially the Earth Firsties and Greenpeace.

It's really a pleasure when one sees a turnaround in thinking
such as yours.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...


I fail to see how something as sensible as getting rid of
cars and all the pollution and inefficiency they cause can
be called liberalism.

There is nothing in the Constitution that guarantees the
right to own and operate automobiles.



"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
Sounds like the liberal agenda to me. This is what you're
promoting?

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
I think we should ban cars.

I would really love to see that happen. Get rid of all privately
owned ground vehicles and build some real mass transportation.

How about some fast trains, some people-mover sidewalks,
fancy busses with bars built in, decent subways, etc. It would
be a vast improvement over the present system of mass
congestion and pollution.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

There are more people murdered in Washington D.C. daily
than soldiers in Iraq. Grow up bloomer boy! We've still
got a job to do and whining about what it takes to get
it done doesn't get it. Give our troops some credit instead
of berating their sacrifices in protecting your sorry ass.

So, I guess that you would agree that the losses are "militarily
insignificant"?

Bring back the body bags. They don't count for ****, EH?


Regards



Donal
--