Here Skitch
 

You're using a middle school project as a reference? Alif and Teddy would be so happy to
know how definitive you consider their 7th grade project!

Do you also believe in whales in the Great Lakes?


"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Here's a site that says the Great White can hit 36 feet. This is obviously
based on the dead specimen found in some nets.

http://www.palmbeach.k12.fl.us/congr...es/species.htm

Here Skitch
 

Robert Brody wrote, "Here's a site that says the Great White can hit
36 feet. This is obviously based on the dead specimen found in some
nets."

As also mentioned in several books, including Blue Meridian. I doubt many
people believe the story, so don't get scared!

RB

Here Skitch
 

draw the conversation away from your stupid and
unsupportable remarks.

Poor bitter Billy! How small is your boat? 25? 27?


RB

Here Skitch
 

"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...

Poor little me! How small is my IQ? 25? 27?


RB

Here Skitch
 

Perhaps
you should work on your tan.

Tans are unhealthy!

RB

Here Skitch
 

"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...
Perhaps
you should work on your tan.

Tans are unhealthy!


So is blubber but that doesn't stop you.

Here Skitch
 

My boat is fine,

Bwahahahahaha! Man, THAT'S sad!
But funny!

RB

Here Skitch
 

Tans are unhealthy!


So is blubber but that doesn't stop you.

My biceps are bigger than your head now. I weigh in at 211 at 6'3 and bike 3
days a week on trails. I run twice a week and do sprints CARRYING my bike on
the local horse trails. I'm your genetic superior in every way due to my
excellent eating habits and constant workouts. Suzanne is in better shape and
could pound you into a meatloaf. She's an excellent boxer...and not some lame
"kickboxer" but a woman who can fight.
Neal, you're all blow and no show!

Bwahahahhahahaha!

RB

Here Skitch
 

I hear you went swimming on Saturday and Sunday while everyone else
was out sailing thier documented vessels.

We sailed and swam and sailed at night.
You just sailed!

Sorry!

RB

Here Skitch
 

Yeh, but Susie says you have a small weenie.
(troll, for those unable to figure it out)

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Tans are unhealthy!


So is blubber but that doesn't stop you.

My biceps are bigger than your head now. I weigh in at 211 at 6'3 and bike
3
days a week on trails. I run twice a week and do sprints CARRYING my bike
on
the local horse trails. I'm your genetic superior in every way due to my
excellent eating habits and constant workouts. Suzanne is in better shape
and
could pound you into a meatloaf. She's an excellent boxer...and not some
lame
"kickboxer" but a woman who can fight.
Neal, you're all blow and no show!

Bwahahahhahahaha!

RB

Here Skitch
 

Yeah I did... North Atlantic... known fact that Great Whites are here and
often spotted. We also have Porbeagle, Mako, Blue and Greenland sharks. Not
to mention Wolf Eels that can crush your femur to pulp in one bite.

I was in the water for 4 hours yesterday, 2 hours today and 4 hours last
Friday. .... my hands were bleeding in numerous places from the shackle and
chains I was working with. There are so many sharks spotted around here that
they are planning a Shark Fishing contest for later this season.

Man O' Man... what a bunch of frilly laced little girls you city slickers
are.... all oohh-h-h-s & Ah-h-h-s about one frickin shark sighting. Cripes
but Oz, Peter Wiley and MC must be laughing at the ruckus.

CM



"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
| I'm not scared at all. You must be scared as hell,
|
| I went swimming Sat and Sunday! Did you?
|
| Bwahahahahhahaha!
|
| RB

Here Skitch
 

Tans are healthy and are triggered by exposure to the sun to protect your
epidermal layer from UV radiation. There is nothing unhealthy about a tan.
What's unhealthy is basting yourself in oil and baking in the noonday sun.
Anemic white is not healthy unless you live underground or are unable to
produce the melanin required to darken the skin colour during exposure.

CM

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
| Perhaps
| you should work on your tan.
|
| Tans are unhealthy!
|
| RB

Here Skitch
 

If tans were so unhealthy there sure would be a lot
more sick Negroes!


"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ...
Tans are healthy and are triggered by exposure to the sun to protect your
epidermal layer from UV radiation. There is nothing unhealthy about a tan.
What's unhealthy is basting yourself in oil and baking in the noonday sun.
Anemic white is not healthy unless you live underground or are unable to
produce the melanin required to darken the skin colour during exposure.

CM

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
| Perhaps
| you should work on your tan.
|
| Tans are unhealthy!
|
| RB

Here Skitch
 

Putting aside Neal's racism, tans (any tan) is not healthy.
Ask any dermitologist.

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
...
Tans are healthy and are triggered by exposure to the sun to protect your
epidermal layer from UV radiation. There is nothing unhealthy about a tan.
What's unhealthy is basting yourself in oil and baking in the noonday sun.
Anemic white is not healthy unless you live underground or are unable to
produce the melanin required to darken the skin colour during exposure.

CM

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
| Perhaps
| you should work on your tan.
|
| Tans are unhealthy!
|
| RB

Here Skitch
 

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
Yeh, but Susie says you have a small weenie.
(troll, for those unable to figure it out)


She told me that I had a big one! Poor Bob!



Regards



Donal
--

Here Skitch
 

On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:46:45 -0400, "Jeff Morris"
jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote this crap:

You're using a middle school project as a reference? Alif and Teddy would be so happy to
know how definitive you consider their 7th grade project!

Do you also believe in whales in the Great Lakes?

Only if your sister is there.





Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Beers!

Here Skitch
 

Are you sure she didn't say you ARE a big one?

Scotty

"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
Yeh, but Susie says you have a small weenie.
(troll, for those unable to figure it out)


She told me that I had a big one! Poor Bob!



Regards



Donal
--

Here Skitch
 

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

| Putting aside Neal's racism, tans (any tan) is not healthy.
| Ask any dermitologist.

I did Ganz.... my dermatologist says there is nothing wrong with a tan and
that my maintaining a tan all year round is better than burning in
seasonally. Moderation is the key here... maintain a tan and don't burn.
It's the burn that damages your skin. I'm not saying nor have I implied that
constant extended exposure to solar radiation is healthy... just that having
an increased melanin content is not unhealthy. I have heard that sun
exposure is required for vitamin D... I'm not certain as to the validity of
that claim.

CM

Here Skitch
 

Not burning seasonally is certainly less desireable than
burning seasonally. However, a tan is the body's defense
mechanism and damage. That's the bottom line.

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
...

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

| Putting aside Neal's racism, tans (any tan) is not healthy.
| Ask any dermitologist.

I did Ganz.... my dermatologist says there is nothing wrong with a tan
and
that my maintaining a tan all year round is better than burning in
seasonally. Moderation is the key here... maintain a tan and don't burn.
It's the burn that damages your skin. I'm not saying nor have I implied
that
constant extended exposure to solar radiation is healthy... just that
having
an increased melanin content is not unhealthy. I have heard that sun
exposure is required for vitamin D... I'm not certain as to the validity
of
that claim.

CM

Here Skitch
 

It's a healthy response, but still damage. The suntan is just
a lower version of sunburn. Sorry, but you need to do some
research on this. You're wrong and you'll regret it eventually.
One of my best friends is a dermatologist. He has no financial
incentive to tell me otherwise.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
I agree with Moroon. Of course a dermitologist will say
a tan is unhealthy. They make money foisting off that
ignorant view upon their clients. They know everyone
gets out in the sun for long enough periods for untanned
skin to become damaged. They make a living off said
damage.

A tan is the body's healthy response to exposure to
the sun. A burn is the body's adverse reaction to not
having a tan and being exposed to the sun's rays. The
sunburn is the cause of skin cancer - not the suntan.

I hope this helps.


"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
Putting aside Neal's racism, tans (any tan) is not healthy.
Ask any dermitologist.

Here Skitch
 

Seasonal Affective Disorder is cured by vitamin D.

What does that tell you about the importance of
getting some sun?


"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ...

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

| Putting aside Neal's racism, tans (any tan) is not healthy.
| Ask any dermitologist.

I did Ganz.... my dermatologist says there is nothing wrong with a tan and
that my maintaining a tan all year round is better than burning in
seasonally. Moderation is the key here... maintain a tan and don't burn.
It's the burn that damages your skin. I'm not saying nor have I implied that
constant extended exposure to solar radiation is healthy... just that having
an increased melanin content is not unhealthy. I have heard that sun
exposure is required for vitamin D... I'm not certain as to the validity of
that claim.

CM

Here Skitch
 

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
| It's a healthy response, but still damage. The suntan is just
| a lower version of sunburn.

No Jon.... a tan is not a lower version of a sunburn. A sunburn is a
radiation burn and should be avoided. A Tan is the result of melanin in the
epidermal layer. You can tan and not burn.

I'm not the one requiring research here..... you are. I have an allergic
reaction to sunlight. I have discussed this with many specialists and none
of them have suggested that a tan is bad for you. All of them have warned a
burn is bad for you. You can tan without burning by limited exposure and a
good sunscreen.

CM

Here Skitch
 

Sure I do... I have had an allergy to ultraviolet radiation since I was 18.
It is aggravated by use of soap. I admitted this years ago. I also have a
healthy god like copper tan and work outdoors all day....

Only wimps are frightened of sun exposure. I've had "sun poisoning" twice to
date from extended periods outdoors working without sunscreen. Big Deal....
I have never exhibited any signs or indication of lesions or cancerous
growths. I do get checked every couple of years.

Gilly is a mountain boy and only subject to sunlight every year for 2
months.....

CM



"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
| you have a dermatologist? He he he he, oh boy, wait till Gilly reads
this.
|
| Scotty
|
| "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
| ...
|
| "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
|
| | Putting aside Neal's racism, tans (any tan) is not healthy.
| | Ask any dermitologist.
|
| I did Ganz.... my dermatologist says there is nothing wrong with a tan
| and
| that my maintaining a tan all year round is better than burning in
| seasonally. Moderation is the key here... maintain a tan and don't burn.
| It's the burn that damages your skin. I'm not saying nor have I implied
| that
| constant extended exposure to solar radiation is healthy... just that
| having
| an increased melanin content is not unhealthy. I have heard that sun
| exposure is required for vitamin D... I'm not certain as to the validity
| of
| that claim.
|
| CM
|
|
|
|
|

Here Skitch
 

No it's not the bottom line.... a tan is not from damaged skin.... it's the
result of the body releasing a natural protective pigment. You do not need
to damage your skin to tan.

CM

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
| Not burning seasonally is certainly less desireable than
| burning seasonally. However, a tan is the body's defense
| mechanism and damage. That's the bottom line.

Here Skitch
 

"Peter Wiley" wrote in message
| Try tiger sharks if you want really scary. Vicious, large *and*
| common.

Yup... I was a commercial diver on a cable barge laying a line to an
island.... we saw over two dozen Tiger Sharks in a 4 day period there down
to 180 feet. We dove pairs to have one person keep an eye on curious
tigers... they where armed with CO2 shark spears which would theoretically
inflate a shark unpin striking with sufficient gas to keep it from being
"interested". We never used any of them.

My favourite were the Hammerheads in Pago Harbour. I saw lots of sharks
while tacking zincs to Korean Longliners at the Star-Kist Plant. Many
different varieties.... The boats were docked next to the outfall from the
processing plant... guts and tidbits all around and usually a feeding frenzy
going on somewhere nearby. I was never attacked by any of the sharks....
although some would show aggressive behaviour by dropping their pectorals
and arching their backs while making quick zig zag motions near me... that's
when I would retreat to the prop cage.

CM

Here Skitch
 

Okay Mooron, enough of this. Tanning is a bad thing. Tan sking ALWAYS indicates
some level of damage.

Providing a definition of "tanning" isn't as stupid as it seems. A tan
occurs when the skin absorbs ultraviolet radiation (commonly called "UV rays").
As a response, the skin produces a substance known as melanin, which darkens
the skin's outer layers. While many believe that a tan makes us appear
healthier, a tan is actually a sign that the skin has been damaged. It's
similar to the beginning stages of a burn.

And there you have it.

RB

Here Skitch
 

And more...

Even tanning slowly and carefully is dangerous. Darrell Rigel, M.D.,
clinical assistant professor of dermatology at New York University,
Manhattan, maintains, There's no such thing as a safe tan. That's the key
point. You have to think about why you tan. The body senses that it is being
injured by UV radiation and, to protect itself, it produces melanin.
(Melanin is the body's natural sun block, the dark pigment that skin cells
produce to block out damaging rays and that cause tanning.)

But further damage occurs at the cellular level, he explains. When the sun
hits the skin, the DNA in the skin cells gets distorted. Think of the DNA
in the cell as a spiral staircase," he says. What happens is that the two
chains of the DNA are no longer connected and the stairs go off at a funny
angle. Normal people have the enzyme that attempts to repair the damage.?
But, he adds, the repair is never total; some damage always remains, and it
accumulates over the years.

Here Skitch
 

"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...
And more...

Even tanning slowly and carefully is dangerous. Darrell Rigel, M.D.,
clinical assistant professor of dermatology at New York University,
Manhattan, maintains, There's no such thing as a safe tan. That's the key
point. You have to think about why you tan. The body senses that it is being
injured by UV radiation and, to protect itself, it produces melanin.
(Melanin is the body's natural sun block, the dark pigment that skin cells
produce to block out damaging rays and that cause tanning.)

The body does not sense it is being injured. The skin reacts to the UV
and produces melanin to KEEP the skin from being injured. This doctor
us an idiot educated in a liberal university that is clearly teaching lies.


But further damage occurs at the cellular level, he explains. When the sun
hits the skin, the DNA in the skin cells gets distorted. Think of the DNA
in the cell as a spiral staircase," he says. What happens is that the two
chains of the DNA are no longer connected and the stairs go off at a funny
angle. Normal people have the enzyme that attempts to repair the damage.?
But, he adds, the repair is never total; some damage always remains, and it
accumulates over the years.

Wrong again. Melanin shades the living skin cells before they can sustain
damage to the DNA. And what's this nonsense about skin cell getting
distorted? Ha aha hhah ah ha ha ha hahahah! I suppose skin cells never
get distorted by movement? I guess they will be saying next "Don't move,
you'll distort your skin cells!!!". Ha ha hahhahah a ha hah ha ha hah!
See how stupid a liberal education makes people?

Here Skitch
 

People who get burn have stayed out of the sun too long.
Regular and reasonable exposure to the sun will keep
the pigment in place. The very first time one gets in the
sun one should do it for a short period so one does
not burn.

What you are saying in like saying water will kill you.
Sure water will kill you if you try to breath it or if you
drink four gallons of it a day. If you use it in a normal
manner water will not kill you. Nor will the sun damage
your skin. It is only overexposure to the sun that can
damage the skin via the burning process.


"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...
The skin reacts to the UV
and produces melanin to KEEP the skin from being injured. This doctor
us an idiot educated in a liberal university that is clearly teaching lies.

If the skin could react fast enough to prevent damage, people wouldn't get
burns, you putz!

RB

Here Skitch
 

Regular and reasonable exposure to the sun will keep
the pigment in place.

According to every medical source, regular exposure to the sun results in skin
that loses elasticity and a higher risk for skin cancer.
My best friend's father was a geological surveyor, tanned from years of working
on sites most of his life. His "regular exposure" resulted in a long battle
with skin cancer.
Only a fool takes the sun lightly. Wear protection and you'll live longer and
look better!

RB

Here Skitch
 

That's as disputed as anything causing cancer in mice because they were
subjected to abnormal amounts of any substance.

20 years ago they claimed eating more than 2 eggs a week would guarantee a
heart attack..... now they figured out there are two kinds of cholesterol.
Suddenly eating eggs is good for you. Now they say milk is bad for you. They
claimed drinking any type of alcohol was unhealthy... now they revised that
and claim that some alcohol is actually good for you.

Look Bob... a Tan is a normal healthy reaction to exposure to the sun. We
are born naked and learned to deal with our environment. What sent the
cancer rates soaring are the idiots who bake in grease for 3 hours a day in
the noon day sun to alter the colour of their skin.... victims of fashion.

It is now becoming once again fashionable to be alabaster white like it was
in the Victorian times. This too will fade away in time.....

I would suggest to you that since you live in a highly artificial
environment and are subject to media over-exposure of the current trends in
fashion, dieting, thinking and moods of the scientific community... your
time should be better spent on concerns to the damage that breathing all the
carcinogenic compounds saturated in your city atmosphere will cause....
rather than natural sunlight and fresh air.

CM



"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
| Okay Mooron, enough of this. Tanning is a bad thing. Tan sking ALWAYS
indicates
| some level of damage.
|
| Providing a definition of "tanning" isn't as stupid as it seems. A tan
| occurs when the skin absorbs ultraviolet radiation (commonly called "UV
rays").
| As a response, the skin produces a substance known as melanin, which
darkens
| the skin's outer layers. While many believe that a tan makes us appear
| healthier, a tan is actually a sign that the skin has been damaged. It's
| similar to the beginning stages of a burn.
|
| And there you have it.
|
| RB

Here Skitch
 

Bob... that's just plain misleading.... cancer is something not as cut and
dried as you make it seem. Some types of skin are prone to burns, some types
[olive for instance] are prone to tan. You can no more make a blanket
condemnation that exposure will result in cancer than stating having a boat
makes one a sailor.

There are some people who will never get cancer no matter how long they stay
in the sun.... some will get cancer with mild exposure. Just like some
people smoke all their lives and never suffer lung cancer. Your statement is
based on speculation, fear and fashionable attitude... not facts.

CM




"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
| Regular and reasonable exposure to the sun will keep
| the pigment in place.
|
| According to every medical source, regular exposure to the sun results in
skin
| that loses elasticity and a higher risk for skin cancer.
| My best friend's father was a geological surveyor, tanned from years of
working
| on sites most of his life. His "regular exposure" resulted in a long
battle
| with skin cancer.
| Only a fool takes the sun lightly. Wear protection and you'll live longer
and
| look better!
|
| RB

Here Skitch
 

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:46:45 -0400, "Jeff Morris"
jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote this crap:

You're using a middle school project as a reference? Alif and Teddy
would be so happy to
know how definitive you consider their 7th grade project!

Do you also believe in whales in the Great Lakes?

Only if your sister is there.

Is nobody's sister safe from Horvath's attentions?



Regards


Donal
--

Here Skitch
 

remember when they claimed 'mothers' milk' was bad for babies?

Scotty

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
...
That's as disputed as anything causing cancer in mice because they were
subjected to abnormal amounts of any substance.

20 years ago they claimed eating more than 2 eggs a week would guarantee a
heart attack..... now they figured out there are two kinds of cholesterol.
Suddenly eating eggs is good for you. Now they say milk is bad for you.
They
claimed drinking any type of alcohol was unhealthy... now they revised
that
and claim that some alcohol is actually good for you.

Look Bob... a Tan is a normal healthy reaction to exposure to the sun. We
are born naked and learned to deal with our environment. What sent the
cancer rates soaring are the idiots who bake in grease for 3 hours a day
in
the noon day sun to alter the colour of their skin.... victims of
fashion.

It is now becoming once again fashionable to be alabaster white like it
was
in the Victorian times. This too will fade away in time.....

I would suggest to you that since you live in a highly artificial
environment and are subject to media over-exposure of the current trends
in
fashion, dieting, thinking and moods of the scientific community... your
time should be better spent on concerns to the damage that breathing all
the
carcinogenic compounds saturated in your city atmosphere will cause....
rather than natural sunlight and fresh air.

CM



"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
| Okay Mooron, enough of this. Tanning is a bad thing. Tan sking ALWAYS
indicates
| some level of damage.
|
| Providing a definition of "tanning" isn't as stupid as it seems. A
tan
| occurs when the skin absorbs ultraviolet radiation (commonly called "UV
rays").
| As a response, the skin produces a substance known as melanin, which
darkens
| the skin's outer layers. While many believe that a tan makes us appear
| healthier, a tan is actually a sign that the skin has been damaged. It's
| similar to the beginning stages of a burn.
|
| And there you have it.
|
| RB

Here Skitch
 

drinking water will kill you????????????

"Simple Simon" wrote
Sure water will kill you if you try to breath it or if you
drink four gallons of it a day.

Here Skitch
 

No. UV is bad for the skin. A lot of people think
that those tanning booths are better because you
can get a controlled tan. They're wrong.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...


Simply absorbing UV does not harm the skin. If this were
the case evolution would have provided scales or something.

Too much UV can harm the skin and too much UV causes
a burn. Acceptable amounts of UV cause a tan which is
NOT harmful in any way. What you are seeing is a pigment
and not damage.


"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Okay Mooron, enough of this. Tanning is a bad thing. Tan sking ALWAYS
indicates
some level of damage.

Providing a definition of "tanning" isn't as stupid as it seems. A
tan
occurs when the skin absorbs ultraviolet radiation (commonly called "UV
rays").
As a response, the skin produces a substance known as melanin, which
darkens
the skin's outer layers. While many believe that a tan makes us appear
healthier, a tan is actually a sign that the skin has been damaged. It's
similar to the beginning stages of a burn.

And there you have it.

RB

Here Skitch
 

No, what he's saying is that ANY water in the lungs from
an outside source is bad for you. Too much will kill you.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
People who get burn have stayed out of the sun too long.
Regular and reasonable exposure to the sun will keep
the pigment in place. The very first time one gets in the
sun one should do it for a short period so one does
not burn.

What you are saying in like saying water will kill you.
Sure water will kill you if you try to breath it or if you
drink four gallons of it a day. If you use it in a normal
manner water will not kill you. Nor will the sun damage
your skin. It is only overexposure to the sun that can
damage the skin via the burning process.


"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
The skin reacts to the UV
and produces melanin to KEEP the skin from being injured. This doctor
us an idiot educated in a liberal university that is clearly teaching
lies.

If the skin could react fast enough to prevent damage, people wouldn't
get
burns, you putz!

RB

Here Skitch
 

Some people are less susceptible to the damaging effects than
others. Everyone has some damage from exposure to the sun.

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
...
Bob... that's just plain misleading.... cancer is something not as cut
and
dried as you make it seem. Some types of skin are prone to burns, some
types
[olive for instance] are prone to tan. You can no more make a blanket
condemnation that exposure will result in cancer than stating having a
boat
makes one a sailor.

There are some people who will never get cancer no matter how long they
stay
in the sun.... some will get cancer with mild exposure. Just like some
people smoke all their lives and never suffer lung cancer. Your statement
is
based on speculation, fear and fashionable attitude... not facts.

CM




"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
| Regular and reasonable exposure to the sun will keep
| the pigment in place.
|
| According to every medical source, regular exposure to the sun results
in
skin
| that loses elasticity and a higher risk for skin cancer.
| My best friend's father was a geological surveyor, tanned from years of
working
| on sites most of his life. His "regular exposure" resulted in a long
battle
| with skin cancer.
| Only a fool takes the sun lightly. Wear protection and you'll live
longer
and
| look better!
|
| RB

Here Skitch
 

If you drink enough...

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
drinking water will kill you????????????

"Simple Simon" wrote
Sure water will kill you if you try to breath it or if you
drink four gallons of it a day.

Here Skitch
 

Can't be done Wheat germ........ no way, not in a month of Sundays will
drinking water kill you in and of itself.... you'll get light headed and
pass out before you can kill yourself.


CM


"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
| If you drink enough...
|
| "Scott Vernon" wrote in message
| ...
| drinking water will kill you????????????
|
| "Simple Simon" wrote
| Sure water will kill you if you try to breath it or if you
| drink four gallons of it a day.
|
|
|
|