| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Now, I am confused. All this sounds like it applies to an assy and not a
symmetrical spin. I thought these tacker things were for symmetrical spinnakers, because assys already work like a tacker - i.e., sail generally secured to bow of boat. Some fly assys with poles, but that defeats the purpose for cruisers. I thought the tacker was to allow you to fly a symetrical spinnaker on a reach without the pole. If you have an assymetrical spinnaker, you probably have a tack arrangment and why would you need a jury rig thing like a Tacker? Did you see the photos of the thing? No, but I've heard of it. It allows the traditional spinaker to be flown with the tack attached to the forestay. That's what I thought, but XR 750 dsecribed its use with an assymetrical spin which struck me as odd. I think that it is aimed at people who have a normal spinaker, but who don't have an asymmetric. A spinaker is a bit more macho than a cruising chute, so I think that more people(me included) own a spinaker than an assymetric. I agree, although I wish I had an assy instead of a symetrical spinnaker. I'd like to see some evidence that it wouldn't damage the forestay or the furled jenny when a gust hits. Otherwise, it looks like a good idea. I think that is the main rap on the thing. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Technical Question, Please help settle an argument. | General | |||
| Another strip-plank question - a bit long | Boat Building | |||
| Other choice and counterpoise question | Electronics | |||
| Exhaust question on inboard 1958 Chris Craft | General | |||
| Asymmetrical spinnaker question | ASA | |||