Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "SkitchNYC" wrote in message ... Now, I am confused. All this sounds like it applies to an assy and not a symmetrical spin. I thought these tacker things were for symmetrical spinnakers, because assys already work like a tacker - i.e., sail generally secured to bow of boat. Some fly assys with poles, but that defeats the purpose for cruisers. I thought the tacker was to allow you to fly a symetrical spinnaker on a reach without the pole. If you have an assymetrical spinnaker, you probably have a tack arrangment and why would you need a jury rig thing like a Tacker? Did you see the photos of the thing? It allows the traditional spinaker to be flown with the tack attached to the forestay. I think that it is aimed at people who have a normal spinaker, but who don't have an asymmetric. A spinaker is a bit more macho than a cruising chute, so I think that more people(me included) own a spinaker than an assymetric. I'd like to see some evidence that it wouldn't damage the forestay or the furled jenny when a gust hits. Otherwise, it looks like a good idea. Regards Donal -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Technical Question, Please help settle an argument. | General | |||
Another strip-plank question - a bit long | Boat Building | |||
Other choice and counterpoise question | Electronics | |||
Exhaust question on inboard 1958 Chris Craft | General | |||
Asymmetrical spinnaker question | ASA |