Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave" wrote in message
... On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:19:56 -0800, "Capt. JG" said: You didn't Google far enough, Jon. Add "two fleet rule" to your search terms and repeat your search, and then you might be able to begin to answer my question. Or at least perhaps fool somebody into thinking you have a clue. I stand by my answer. Bzzzzzt. Wrong. You can lead a horse to water..... The answer is that unless the cars Ford sells have at least 75% domestic content, Ford can't count those cars against its separate U.S. fleet CAFE requirements. This is the result of a rule the Congress critters enacted at the behest of the UAW, designed to insure that domestic manufacturers couldn't meet their fuel economy requirements by selling cars produced by more efficient or less expensive labor offshore.The effect is that they have to produce and sell enough small cars built with U.S. labor to offset the low mileage larger vehicles they produce here, even if they have to sell those domestically produced small cars at a loss. It's a UAW job protection boondoggle. Bzzzzt. Wrong again Dave. You can try to reason with a right-wingnut, but..... So, you're trying to claim that Toyota doesn't have at least that percentage in it's US sold cars??? Think again dude. As I said, I stand by my original answer. For example, "Toyota Tundra's solid domestic-parts content rating, up to 80 percent for 2008 from 75 percent for 2007." "The '08 Ford Focus dropped to 65 percent from 75 percent in domestic-parts content." Why don't you try and blame the UAW again, if it makes you feel better. LOL -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |