I know military personnel are willing to take risks...
On 1/14/14, 10:06 PM, KC wrote:
On 1/14/2014 6:50 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
Reasonable, but I still think the "Force Command" (not commander) should
be responsible for the safety of the Force....
Obviously you don't understand how the Navy chain of command works.
No I don't... But imagine how cool it would be if you would educate
us... When a ship is out in service, who is responsible for the safety
of the crews? For the sake of argument lets say, the reports of
contaminated drinking water are true, who is it that should have been
watching for that, surely it's not the corporation or country we are
going to help??
The captain of a vessel has sole responsibility for the safety of the
crew and the ship. If something horrific happens, a lower ranking
officer may be faulted if fault is involved, but that officer works
under the direction of the captain. Period.
|