On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 17:44:35 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 4/7/2013 4:09 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 12:59:21 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 13:32:25 -0400, Wayne B wrote:

On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 10:01:12 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

Well, that should put an end to the rape, incest, and broken rubber requirement for abortions.

====

Not at all. It depends on the age and maturity of the individual.
Why are you so intent on seeing 11 and 12 year old girls give birth
after being impregnated in some unfortunate way? That's really kind
of sick when you think about it.

Where did you get such a ridiculous idea? Give the 11 and 12 year olds the morning after pill. Why
should they be forced to undergo an abortion?

You come up with some strange ideas about what I'm thinking!!


=============

John, I've always given you credit for being smarter than that but
sometimes I wonder.

Do you really think that all rape and incest gets reported, and acted
upon, in a timely manner?


Do you really think everybody who doesn't like abortion wants to see 11
and 12 year old girls give birth after being impregnated in some
unfortunate way?

That is loogiesque thinking and not really consistent with what we are
used to from you...

===

Sorry to disappoint but maybe you misinterpreted something.

In reaction to the recent policy change on the morning after pill,
John said, and I quote:

"Well, that should put an end to the rape, incest, and broken rubber
requirement for abortions."

And I said: "Not at all".

The reason being that rape and incest of young children are often not
reported right away, if at all. Frequently no one knows what is
going on until the child becomes pregnant, obviously too late for a
morning after pill to do any good. Which of course leaves nothing but
tough choices. What would you do if it was your daughter?