On Monday, July 23, 2012 4:08:52 PM UTC-3, iBoaterer wrote:
In article b.com>,
says...
>
> On 7/23/2012 11:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
> > In article b.com>,
> > says...
> >>
> >> On 7/23/2012 11:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
> >>> In article b.com>,
> >>> says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 7/23/2012 10:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
> >>>>> In article .com>,
> >>>>> says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 7/23/2012 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article b.com>,
> >>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 7/23/2012 9:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article .com>,
> >>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 7/23/2012 8:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article > ,
> >>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>&gt ;
> >>>>>>>>>>>&gt ; On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:03:19 -0400, iBoaterer > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>&gt ;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; http://sparkiearbuckle.sayanythingbl...erman-will-be-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; convicted-and-this-is-why/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;
> >>>>>>>>>>>&gt ;
> >>>>>>>>>>>&gt ; It seems like all of your facts come from a liberal blog
> >>>>>>>>>>>&gt ;
> >>>>>>>>>>>&gt ; How many of those 100 year old precedents are based on current Florida
> >>>>>>>>>>>&gt ; law?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> All of them. A precedent is a precedent.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I'm afraid you dun been fooled. Fool
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> How so, specifically?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> How can you create a precedent based on a law that might not have been
> >>>>>>>> written and passed yet?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> No. You can, however use precedent in a second degree murder trial.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> That's not what you said.
> >>>>>> Words have meaning.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I said a precedent is a precedent. In the case of Zimmerman, this would
> >>>>> be a precedent for second degree murder. That's what he's been charged
> >>>>> with. WTF did you think the precedent cited were for, jaywalking?
> >>>>>
> >>>> Show us the precedent in question.
> >>>
> >>> I didn't know any of the precedents suggested were in question....
> >>>
> >> Which precedents were suggested, by whom, for what. Quit dancin boy.
> >
> > You didn't look at the link I posted??????
> >
> I hardly ever do.

Well then, that answers why you are ignorant.

Ouch! Snerk!