"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:30:30 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:


I am with you on this, but bpuharic and nom-du-plume types are clearly
an issue because they support Obama's madness. I am not sure if it is
selfishness or stupidity or both, but they sure follow the pied piper
like good little sheep.

gee. he forgets..or ignores, the fact the rich WHITE guy spent a
TRILLION in iraq for NOTHING. at least obama is spending on the US
economy. bush paid his rich halliburton/KKR buddies.


One thing no Obamanite wants to realize is how much unemployment has
Obama debt-bailout spend cost in jobs?

you mean because unemployment has dropped 3% over the last few months?
that what you complaining about?

you want it at 25%. good luck with that, right winger


Well, to give him credit, the chart at this site is pretty subtle.
Perhaps it's too subtle for Canuck.

http://palatnikfactor.com/2010/02/06...resident-bush/

--
Nom=de=Plume


That chart showes that Obama's "Stimulus" has failed. Resolutely failed.
There are less jobs being lost each month because there are not that many
jobs being done. Show us a chart of the real unemployment.

Good God... it's a mirror of what Bush caused. You really need to stop
listening to Rush.

There's a recovery underway. It may not be strong, it might not even be
sustainable. We'll have to wait and see, but to deny reality....

FYI, it's fewer jobs being loss, not less jobs being lost, but you got it
right fewer jobs are being lost. Yes, there are people dropping off the
unemployment roles and are no longer being counted. Yes, the unemployment
numbers are worse because of this fact, but the rate of job loss is slowing.
Just about all economists agree that the job situation isn't getting worse
but getting better.

--
Nom=de=Plume