vatican astronomer blasts creationism
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:07:34 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:56:05 -0400, JohnRant
wrote:
The origins of man have not been proven. Until they are done so, there
is no harm in presenting what several billion (see, I fixed it)
believe, even if presented only as a belief without proof.
That's fine, just don't present it in a science class because there is
no science to it.
Facts about a scientific theory should be presented. It is a fact that
several billion people believe there was some form of Higher Power
influence in the development of man.
That fact should be presented, along with the other facts.
Furthermore, *only* the facts should be presented. If conjectures,
such as those made here about man's development of intelligence, are
presented as a 'fact' of evolution, then the alternative should also
be presented.
--
John H
All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.
|