| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:07:34 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote: On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:56:05 -0400, JohnRant wrote: The origins of man have not been proven. Until they are done so, there is no harm in presenting what several billion (see, I fixed it) believe, even if presented only as a belief without proof. That's fine, just don't present it in a science class because there is no science to it. Facts about a scientific theory should be presented. It is a fact that several billion people believe there was some form of Higher Power influence in the development of man. That fact should be presented, along with the other facts. Furthermore, *only* the facts should be presented. If conjectures, such as those made here about man's development of intelligence, are presented as a 'fact' of evolution, then the alternative should also be presented. -- John H All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Right-wing newspaper slams cretinism, er, creationism museum | General | |||
| GOP blasts GOP | General | |||
| OT Creationism or evolution? | General | |||
| (OT) Reagan blasts Bush | General | |||
| Billionaire Blasts Bush | General | |||