On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:13:48 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:


wrote in message
news
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:06:07 -0700, jps wrote:

I think you have finally argued full circle. In order for a knife to
be an effective weapon, the wielder must be expert and, by your own
admission, a gun is just as difficult to handle as a knife.

Therefore, for a gun to be an effective weapon, the wielder must be an
expert.

Now, maybe you are ready to understand the next logical step, "Weapons
don't kill people, people kill people." Once there, perhaps you'll be
ready to develop effective strategies to stop violence. Historically,
something no amount of "take the weapons away" legislation has
done....

You don't have to be an expert with a gun to kill someone from 10 or
15 feet. You'd certainly have to be an expert with a knife or any
other sharp instrument from 10 or 15 feet.

I'm sure that doesn't make any sense to an NRA supporter.


The issue is not 10 or 15 feet away, it is how fast you can close that
distance and once you are face to face, anyone swinging and stabbing
with a knife is deadly. It takes an expert to keep from being killed.
Any reasonably healthy person is quicker in 10 feet (the original
challenge) than the fastest drag racer. That is an old beer bet you
can't lose.
I suppose the real challenge for the gunslinger is can you actually
have the presence of mind to place a "kill shot", in a fraction of a
second, on an attacker who is lunging at you with a knife, that drops
them before they stab you. Without extensive training, I bet most
people freeze.
Shooting them in the belly or the leg won't do it. You will both die
in the same big pool of blood.

gt, please be advised that the person you are responding to is a contentious
prolific troll, not only here, but on many newsgroups. He isn't worth the
time or effort to **** on.

HTH

Steve, who has had this dumb troll killfiled for a long long long time.

Golly, good thing Steve is here to warn you. Might not have known
otherwise.