Just wait a frekin' minute! wrote:
NotNow wrote:
Just wait a frekin' minute! wrote:
NotNow wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
m...
You also need to run a records check and insist upon a urine test.

I wouldn't waste the time or money.

Eisboch

Sure...go ahead...hire someone with a criminal record who also
abuses drugs.

:)


I've never done that. One thing nice about a small, privately
held business is that you can hire who you want and, if necessary,
fire who you want without going through an act of congress to do so.
In my experience, I've either directly hired or at least approved
the hiring of probably about 200 people between two companies. Of
those, only 3 had to be terminated later. One was a perpetual
trouble maker on the shop floor who constantly caused problems with
others. One was caught seriously fudging expense reports and
bragging about it to others in the company. The third was a thief.

That's not a bad track record.

Eisboch


Oh hell, now Harry thinks that anyone anybody hires has a criminal
record and abuses drugs. WAFA.

Well, at least if they are not in the Union Pfffttt. I used to see
the windows glowing in the van where the top (union) boys smoked
cocaine every day during lunch... Man, these guys weren't worth a
nickel an hour...

What was the name of that newsreader that Tom tried on Gene's
suggestion? I need to be able to filter WAFA's bull**** that everyone
is quoting.


"Gravity"

http://mpgravity.sourceforge.net/


Thanks, have you tried it yet?