On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:00:05 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Jun 23, 7:52*am, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/23/te...kodak.html?hpw

Sad.

Yes, it is. I saw it on the news last night. The funny thing, Harry
thinks it's sad too! The same person that says he doesn't manipulate
photos. All pros will tell you one of the most amazing things about
Kodachrome is that it makes nature's greens much more vibrant!

Great film - all done in post processing in the lab.

I loved the slide film.

Well, there's still Fuji film - the Reala for film and Sensia for
slides - it's good film, but it's not Kodachrome.

Maybe I should head out and see if I can find a few rolls just for old
times sake.