Thread: Whooopeee!!!!!
View Single Post
  #73   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
Capt. JG Capt. JG is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,757
Default Whooopeee!!!!!

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:19:56 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:

You didn't Google far enough, Jon. Add "two fleet rule" to your search
terms
and repeat your search, and then you might be able to begin to answer my
question. Or at least perhaps fool somebody into thinking you have a
clue.



I stand by my answer.


Bzzzzzt. Wrong. You can lead a horse to water.....

The answer is that unless the cars Ford sells have at least 75% domestic
content, Ford can't count those cars against its separate U.S. fleet CAFE
requirements. This is the result of a rule the Congress critters enacted
at
the behest of the UAW, designed to insure that domestic manufacturers
couldn't meet their fuel economy requirements by selling cars produced by
more efficient or less expensive labor offshore.The effect is that they
have
to produce and sell enough small cars built with U.S. labor to offset the
low mileage larger vehicles they produce here, even if they have to sell
those domestically produced small cars at a loss. It's a UAW job
protection
boondoggle.



Bzzzzt. Wrong again Dave. You can try to reason with a right-wingnut,
but.....

So, you're trying to claim that Toyota doesn't have at least that percentage
in it's US sold cars??? Think again dude. As I said, I stand by my original
answer.

For example, "Toyota Tundra's solid domestic-parts content rating, up to 80
percent for 2008 from 75 percent for 2007."

"The '08 Ford Focus dropped to 65 percent from 75 percent in domestic-parts
content."

Why don't you try and blame the UAW again, if it makes you feel better. LOL

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com