On Aug 21, 9:08*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message

...





wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:10:32 -0400, Eisboch wrote:

I realize that and have witnessed it. * But, they are not typically
"corporations". *They are often small time construction or landscaper
type businesses that simply don't show up on the radar screen.

Eisboch

OK, now we are on the same page. *I would agree larger corporations would
be foolhardy to actively employ illegals. *I suspect it is done
peripherally as in the Walmart case, but rarely outright. *I would also
add, the illegal business is becoming quite a business. *Forged
documents, stolen Social Security cards, etc. can make it difficult to
tell who is illegal. *Many companies will accept bogus IDs with a wink
and a nod, but then others, trying to be legal, can be fooled.

Many large corporations, like wal-mart, hire contractors to get around the
law.

Good grief Harry, you are going to wear out your anti-big corporation drum.

That's *not* the problem.

Eisboch- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Big corp is fine with wafa, as long as everyone is paying those weekly
union dues.. That's what unions do. They typically slow down the work
force so they can hire more dues payers.. Remember, every union member
means money, that is the only way unions make money. .Bodies, moving
or otherwise..