I'll bet you...
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:41:16 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:54:26 -0700 (PDT), NowIn my opinion, hockey
needs to pulll back to the original 16
teams - 20 max. Seriously, who needs hockey in Arizona? Or Los
Angeles?
Until the expansion in 1967 there were 6 teams in the original NHL ;-
Now that was hockey. None of this namby, pamby diluted B.S. Six teams:
Chicago (my home town)
Blackhawks.
Boston
Bruins
Detroit
Red Wings
NY
Rangers
Montreal
Les Canadiens de Montréal - who suck - damned Frenchies.
Toronto
Maple Leafs who don't suck because their official name is in English.
Another sport ruined by expansion.
Well, I can honestly say that the original six teams were helped by
some expansion - adding Pittsburgh and Phildelphia didn't hurt the
league at all. I thought bringing it up to ten teams was a good idea
actually.
And there should have been two more Canadian teams to bring the league
up to some kind of national parity.
|