Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,643
Default I'll bet you...

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:41:16 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"Jim" wrote in message
...

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:54:26 -0700 (PDT), NowIn my opinion, hockey
needs to pulll back to the original 16
teams - 20 max. Seriously, who needs hockey in Arizona? Or Los
Angeles?


Until the expansion in 1967 there were 6 teams in the original NHL ;-



Now that was hockey. None of this namby, pamby diluted B.S. Six teams:

Chicago (my home town)


Blackhawks.

Boston


Bruins

Detroit


Red Wings

NY


Rangers

Montreal


Les Canadiens de Montréal - who suck - damned Frenchies.

Toronto


Maple Leafs who don't suck because their official name is in English.

Another sport ruined by expansion.


Well, I can honestly say that the original six teams were helped by
some expansion - adding Pittsburgh and Phildelphia didn't hurt the
league at all. I thought bringing it up to ten teams was a good idea
actually.

And there should have been two more Canadian teams to bring the league
up to some kind of national parity.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017