View Single Post
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
Cindy[_2_] Cindy[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2008
Posts: 4
Default Clean Boating Act of 2008

Gee Wilbur, You sound like an obnoxious crabby old SOB that hates women. And
you accuse women of reacting with emotion. I posed the question because the
group was asked to support a bill with out any link to the bill. If someone
is asking for my support then *they* should privide all of the facts.

I sure hope for women everywhere that you are gay.

Cindy


"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
anews.com...

"Cindy" wrote in message
. ..
Support it??? I am unsure what the bill is about. Is it engine
emmissions? Or is it waste (holding Tank) dumping? Why would I support a
bill that allows boaters (recreational or otherwise) to dump their turds
into the waterways that our children swin in and we fish for our dinner
in?? With the number of recreational boaters on our waterways...
disgusting.

Perhaps one should post the bill, in it's entirity, before asking for
support.

Cindy



Stop being just another an ignorant twit, Cindy. Certainly YOU are capable
of finding and reading the legislation of concern on-line. But, since you
women are consistently inept when it comes to this sort of thing and you
tend to react with emotions rather than logic mostly because logic is a
foreign concept to most women, I shall render a concise summary for your
benefit.

The legislation (that all recreational boaters should support) excludes
recreational boaters from draconian discharge legislation already in place
whereby some law makers wish to include all recreational boats but has as
its original intent to regulate discharge from shipping where there is a
valid reason for such legislation. Due to the language of the requirements
for shipping, recreational boaters would not be allowed to discharge
ANYTHING into the surrounding waters. In other words you could not
discharge water you used to wash your deck, or dishes, or your body. You
could not throw food scraps into the water to feed the fishes. NOTHING
could be allowed to come from your boat - even clean bilge water and be
allowed to go into the surrounding water. You would have to have a holding
tank for everything.

The sewage issue is already covered and enforced by other existing state
and federal legislation. This potential new legislation is another layer
on top of that.

And for this stupidity you would be required to buy and display a sticker
that would cost you around 100 to 150 dollars a year. If you did not buy
and display the sticker you could be subject to large fines or have your
boat confiscated.Just another tax! Just more Big Brother tactics. And
another law that could not be enforced and would not be enforced due to
lack of manpower but a good way to raise revenue to fatten the paychecks
of the bureaucrats.

Does this help your fluff-headed understanding of the situation? If not
consider you might have a small recreational skiff of say 18 feet in
length. You enjoy going out fishing or just cruising around seeing the
sights or sunbathing and having a beer or two and some barbeque. You
anchor and go swimming. But you won't be allowed to stand on the transom
and wash your hair or your body because some soap or shampoo would end up
in the water. You would not be able to toss any food scraps to the fish or
seagulls. You would not be able to pump your bilge or empty the water from
your live well tanks. You would not be able to wash the suntan oil off the
deck even with biodegradable soap. You would not be able to discharge
anything from your skill. And for this idiocy you would be paying big
bucks for a sticker that is nothing more than a tax.

Now, run along and do your nails or something . . .

Wilbur Hubbard