Apology to gay losers
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:23:55 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:
On Feb 10, 12:06?pm, John H.
The basis for even considering education in the discussion was a claim
that D's oppose "No Child Left Behind", and thaty they do so because
if the amount of education were increased across the country the
number of people supporting the D's would decrease.
Which, by the way, was a valid claim.
--
Then according to your theory, the states with the greatest numbers of
Republicans will be those states with the most successful and
comprehensive educational systems. By the same token, the states with
the smallest number of Republicans will be those states where the
Democrats have succeeded on destroying the education system and
thereby protecting their base.
Care to offer some examples? Half a dozen or so of each would be
sufficient to establish a trend, rather than an exception.
Education isn't a statewide function anywhere that I know of. It's a county
or city function normally.
How do Los Angeles, New York City, and Washington DC do for areas where the
base is protected?
--
John H
|