On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:09:23 -0000, wrote:

On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:13:06 -0500, JG2U wrote:


Uh, perjury and lying are not the same thing. Clinton was guilty of
one, but we was not guilty of the other.

You're correct, Einstein. One is lying in a court of law under oath,
the other is just lying.

And you're wrong, Clinton is guilty of both. Seems to be a pattern of
lying with the liberals, especially in this NG.

Cite? Before you tax yourself, in this country, you are innocent until
proven guilty. Clinton was *never* convicted of perjury.

President Clinton was held in contempt of court by judge Susan
D.Webber Wright for willfully failuring to truthfully testify under
oath.

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stori...nton.contempt/

His license to practice law was suspended in Arkansas and later by the
United States Supreme Court. He was also fined $90,000 for giving
false testimony.

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stori...nton.contempt/

The definition of perjury is:

Perjury: Law. The willful giving of false testimony under oath or
affirmation, before a competent tribunal, upon a point material to a
legal inquiry.

How exactly wasn't he convicted of perjury if his license to practice
law was revoked and he was fined for not telling the truth?

Come on - you are smarter than that.