"John H." wrote in message
news
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oennc@4ax. com...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex
education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no
surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported
their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer
your
question.


I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may
have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of
them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.


So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling, and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are reasons
to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?


I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"


I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause
conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your mettle in a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do for you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the definition, I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

You forgot to look up "sot".