"HK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...

All major corporations want these days is the cheapest possible
workforce, and if that means exporting jobs to China or India, so be it.
The righties think this is "good" for our economy, but it will do us in
sooner rather than later.

The only hope is to elect a president and congress in 2008 who will do
something to stem the flow of jobs. Those are more likely to be
democrats than republicans.

Baloney. Duncan Hunter is about as protectionist as you can get.

My personal pick is Mitt Romney.





Duncan Hunter has about as much chance as either of us to be nominated.
Your nominee will be Guiliani, Romney, or Tired Old Fred.

Hunter will be the VP candidate, and if he isn't he should.



Is Mitt for the war in Iraq, or against it? Or was he for it and is he now
against it? Mr. Flip-Flop..,he'll be fun to Swiftboat.

You guys might shoot your load too early trying to swiftboat Mitt. The only
position that he has "flip-flopped" on is abortion...and pointing out that
that he now takes a pro-life stance after taking a pro-choice stance in
order to win the governorship in MA only solidifies his standing in the
Republican primary.

You should save the flip-flop accusations for *if and when* he becomes the
nominee. It might sell well during a general election with independents
who are pro-choice. But it's not going to sell well with Republicans who
are glad he has "finally seen the light".

Democrats are scared of Romney. He has managed to steal the health care
issue with Romneycare. He is smart, articulate, accomplished, and good
looking. The man has also led a life that is beyond reproach. They'll be
no dirty tricks or last-minute skeletons for an October surprise.

I guess that's why the Dems are sending their attack dogs at the Boston
Globe against him.