On May 29, 10:03 pm, "Capt. Rob" wrote:
It's always sad when seemingly intelligent people ignore serious
environmental problems simply because they don't like the people who
are involved in trying to fix them. Most major scientific
organizations, including my father's friends at The Museum of Natural
History know what's happening They have a research station in
Greenland and it's downright scary.

Nice work, Bart. You're a ****ing idiot. Notice the latest twice a
year accidental dumping in the LIS? I guess you don't believe that
either.

RB
35s5
NY


Instead of discussing things like a gentleman, you are vulgar,
hateful, nasty, and mean spirited. How could anyone take you
seriously when you act like a kook.

Too bad you are not a gentleman Rob. You would see that
there is more to the argument that one side. I believe that
we should take reasonable measures to protect the environment
I just don't agree with all the BS associated with your liberal
views on how it is caused.

Study the Little Ice Age and consider all the ramifications.
Ask also what was the period just before the Little Ice Age like?
Warm eh? Very warm? With bountiful crops? How could that be?

The Earth has gone through warmer phases than this and not
so long ago. We should not expect the Earth to stay exactly
as it is. It never has and it never will be static. Man didn't
start
it and we can't stop it short of taking extreme measures. There
is nothing that Kyoto would do that would have any significant
impact on global warming. I read that. However, I do support
preserving our environment is intelligent well-thought out ways.
I don't support radicalizing it and making hate speech about it.

If you really want to take measures to prevent global warming, why
don't your support using a nuke to start a volcano and put some
dust in the atmosphere? That would solve the problem overnight.
If you really believe Global Warming needs to be stopped that would
work and could be done right now, this year, unstead of the inevitable
warming change everyone is saying will occur.

10,000 years ago, the coastline was at what is now 60 fathoms. Why
not get all that coastline back they way it used to be. We should
have walrus off the coast of LI again! That makes as much sense
as your kook views.

You take the view that man is responsible for all evil. I take
a more hopeful view. You further take the view that the US is
the root of all evil. I disagree with that also. What does Kyoto
Require of China or India? They should keep polluting? I don't
think we should be tied to a different standard than everyone
else. I do think we should find ways to mimimize human
impact on the environment that make sense. To do that we
need open and honest discussion without the hateful language.
It would be better to help developing countries that are cutting
corners with cleaner technologies and by providing tax exemptions
for companies that develop such technologies.

Now go take a Valium and try to be polite next time.