"mr.b" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:13:14 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote:

Actually, my post meant exactly what I intended as I wrote it. But I
suppose when you run out of arguments, restructuring others' posts is all
that's left to you.

hmmm....maybe I used too many words. The site you referenced is the
web-presence of a bunch of paid political hacks with a Republican odour,
financed by corporations with an agenda. Their "experts" lack formal
training in the areas they where they advocate. They exist to obfuscate
the truth and to embroil government agencies in frivolous lawsuits
whenever the interests of public safety are in conflict with big
businesses, like Dow Chemical, Monsanto, ADM, etc...

That looks like an argument to me. You still haven't responded to that.
Oh damn, I used a lot of words again...

Okay, let me respond ad-hominem in kind:

Al Gore and his ilk are knee-jerk reactionary Greenies who want to control
everything, everywhere, every time. They cherry-pick their data to meet
their pre-conceived notions, and their "experts" lack the recognition of
their peers. They despise free enterprise, and are little more than fascists
who wish to Federalize all corporations and make everyone a ward of the
State.

Yeah, that's pretty similar to the "argument" you gave. Hope it isn't to
brief for you to read between the lines.