On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:27:04 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 23:48:36 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 18:20:18 -0500, Charlie Morgan wrote:

On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:50:35 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:38:44 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news:7iskk2tn6lvj18imnsq92c9mr3kh37fear@4ax. com...
Ok, Lamont is a geek and a one issue candidate with all the
personality of a grave stone, but this is a pretty good commercial.

Gotta give him props on this one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbL5eO750gU
--

If voters turn off the reruns of "Raymond" long enough to compare what
Lieberman says to the legislation he's supported, Lamont's got a chance.
But, it probably won't happen.

Ned has no chance, never had a chance and won't even come close to
Joe.

He alreadty trounced him once.

Um....

What?

Primaries?

Couldn't be - he only won endorsement by 3% and barely got a 2% lead
in the primary.

You obviously don't consider 2% or 3% a royal 'trouncing'. What's wrong
with you?

Aren't these the same folks who considered Bush's 'trouncing' of Kerry just
a slim lead?