Iraq did NOT invite us in, we violated any number of international
agreements/laws by invading. The UN told us not to, and WE are killing
innocent Iraqis.

NOW check your math -- the "coalition" has lost 700+ and counting.
35,000/700 = 50. The numbers don't mater all that much -- ONE life lost is
one too many.

You haven't answered my questions though.

What value do you put on American lives? Have you volunteered to go over
and fight? Any relatives over there? Got a Son nearing Draft age maybe?

How Do You Ask a Man to Be the Last Man to Die in Iraq?



" Tuuk" wrote in message
...
So what your saying there Jim is that American lives have more value than
Iraqi lives. You keep talking about the one American,,, yet on average
35,000 Iraqi lives were killed each year. Can you explain why you think an
Iraqi life is only worth 1/35,000 that of an American life?? What are you,
some kind of a racist?

GYHAS









"Jim" wrote in message
...
And what value do you put on American lives? Have you volunteered to go
over and fight? ANy relatives over there? Got a Son nearing Draft age
maybe?

How Do You Ask a Man to Be the Last Man to Die in Iraq?


" Tuuk" wrote in message
...
Come on Harry,,,, GYHAS,,,,

Well then he can make it June 30 2005. If the President's plan and
efforts
continue to save on average 35,000 Iraqi lives per year,, then I think
the
benefits outweigh the costs. Don't you? Or do you not put value on
Iraqi
lives? I know you would rather Bush not have gone in there,,, but he
did,,
and over 35,000 lives have been saved so far because Bush ignores
simpletons
like yourself.

Do you know that those lives lost were very horrible deaths. Most of
the
"bad people" in Iraq would tie the man up in the household. Rape his
daughter right in front of him, then kill her,,,,,,,,, then they would
Beat
and rape his wife,,,,,,, right in front of him,,,, then he would die.
Now
Harry, how in the world can you defend this type of lifestyle? Have
you
no
regard for non white lives? You think the Iraqi lives have no
value????

Come on Harry,,,, your going to have to give your head a shake over
this
one,,,,,,, You must have a headache by now,,, well the head must have
to
have substance before could ache though,,,,,

GYHAS,,,!!!!!!!!!!!!








"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - Iraq's police and armed forces will not have
the
capability to secure the country from the threat of insurgents by
the
time the United States hands power to an Iraqi government on June
30,
the top U.S. administrator said Sunday.

The comments by U.S. civilian administrator L. Paul Bremer aimed to
defend the continued heavy presence of U.S. troops in Iraq after the
occupation officially ends, but also delivered a rare, blunt
assessment
to the Iraqi people.

"It is clear that Iraqi forces will not be able, on their own, to
deal
with these threats by June 30 when an Iraqi government assumes
sovereignty," Bremer said in a statement issued by the U.S.
coalition.

"Events of the past two weeks show that Iraq still faces security
threats and needs outside help to deal with them. Early this month
the
foes of democracy overran Iraqi police stations and seized public
buildings in several parts of the country," he said. "Iraqi forces
were
unable to stop them.





Uh...who is going to tell dumfoch Bush about this...?