View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"bb" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:53:38 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


A vote for Kerry is victory for al Qaeda.

Run on anything except Bush's record, eh? Nice straw man.


As a Conservative Republican, I'm very proud of Bush's record, and can

(and
have) successfully defended it against any partisan attacks.


And I'm very proud of the lettuce seedlings in my front window. So what?


However, Democrats have decided to turn this election into an "anybody

but
Bush" campaign. Well, it's time for Americans to realize the danger of

such
a decision.


There is no danger. You need to think this through more thoroughly.


It's no secret that al Qaeda would claim a huge victory should Bush be

run
from office.


1) They can claim whatever the f..k they want, but they know what you

don't:
Only a moron would draw a connection between the election results and the
future of al Qaeda.


It'd be terrific propaganda. "By inflicting great harm on America and its
allies, we were able to drive the evil Crusader Bush from office."

You don't think that would be a terrific recruiting tool? You don't thank
that al Qaeda training camps would teach the idea that the West's will can
be broken, and its people and elections manipulated through acts of terror?



2) They've claimed a victory in the Spanish elections. Zzzzzzz.....

Nobody
cares.


The terrorist care. The message coming out of all of the terror groups
linked to al Qaeda is that the Spanish elections were a great victory for
them. It was a morale-booster at a time when al Qaeda desperately needed
one.



Why do you think that is? Supposedly, according to Democrats,
the war on terror is a failure.


If you base the quality of the results on whether there's been another
attack HERE, then the results have been good. But, only a moron would

limit
his view to THIS country at this point in time. Iraq is still pretty much

a
free play zone, and the terrorist kiddies are having a ball. Therefore,

that
has been a failure. Afghanistan is also a circus, but you won't believe
that. Try this: We thought we'd create a nice country that could behave

like
other nice countries. Just one problem: 60% of their GNP is derived from
opium poppies, and there's not a damned thing we can do about it.


However, our opponent continues to do
everything possible to mar Bush's chances for reelection. If Bush's
anti-terror policies were such a failure, the enemy wouldn't be so eager

to
see him replaced by a liberal Democrat.


Let's see if I understand you: If we get a Democratic president, the war
ends, the soldiers come home, and all domestic security measures enacted
since 9/11 are reversed? Is that what you predict?


No. But I do predict an increase in al Qaeda's morale leading to emboldened
attacks that result in further appeasement by the West. The end result? al
Qaeda controls 2/3 of the World's oil supply, and America undergoes an
economic collapse not seen since the Great Depression.