"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On 8 Jan 2004 17:32:40 -0800, (Backyard
Renegade) wrote:
(Gould 0738) wrote in message
...
Of course, the fact that one of the commercials plainly said
"sponsored by moveon.org" at the end of the ad seems to have slipped
by your blinders. I love it when you guys forget the facts.
The *fact* is that the ads didn't run in the media.. They were two ads
out of a
much larger group of ads that were submitted to moveon.org as proposals
to
consider for the upcomiong campaign.
It's no different than some redneck getting on a talk show and saying
equally
ridiculous and hateful things about moderates or liberals. Are your
radio hosts
liable for every opinion that their callers express on the air?
Moveon.org vetted these commercials and allowed it to be aired with
the words "sponsored by moveon.org". Lie (it is really not spin when
it comes from someone so intellegent as you) if you want, but they put
it out, sponsored it, approved it, and now they are backing off it...
Gould ain't stoopid. He knows they approved the posting of the
commercials.
Gould ain't stoopid, just disingenuous.
I haven't been paying attention to Chuck's ramblings on this. Is he
*really* claiming the ad was run by an independent individual without the
blessing of moveon.org and the Democratic Party? I find it hard to believe
that he'd be that naive...