Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "WaIIy" wrote in message ... On 8 Jan 2004 17:32:40 -0800, (Backyard Renegade) wrote: (Gould 0738) wrote in message ... Of course, the fact that one of the commercials plainly said "sponsored by moveon.org" at the end of the ad seems to have slipped by your blinders. I love it when you guys forget the facts. The *fact* is that the ads didn't run in the media.. They were two ads out of a much larger group of ads that were submitted to moveon.org as proposals to consider for the upcomiong campaign. It's no different than some redneck getting on a talk show and saying equally ridiculous and hateful things about moderates or liberals. Are your radio hosts liable for every opinion that their callers express on the air? Moveon.org vetted these commercials and allowed it to be aired with the words "sponsored by moveon.org". Lie (it is really not spin when it comes from someone so intellegent as you) if you want, but they put it out, sponsored it, approved it, and now they are backing off it... Gould ain't stoopid. He knows they approved the posting of the commercials. Gould ain't stoopid, just disingenuous. I haven't been paying attention to Chuck's ramblings on this. Is he *really* claiming the ad was run by an independent individual without the blessing of moveon.org and the Democratic Party? I find it hard to believe that he'd be that naive... |