OT--Dem sleaze tactics not working as planned.
"DSK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Acceptable"? WTF?? Is it legal? Yes.
For now.
heh heh when will BushCo think up something really keen, like making it
illegal
to make a campaign contribution to the Democrat Party. That should cover
the
bases.
BTW you are terrible at dodging questions that show you up. -10 pts. Or
are you
willing to answer the question about sedition, especially the parts about
various seditious & treasonous right-wing actions & speeches?
but on a moral scale including such quantifiables as 'starting a war &
killing tens of thousands of people for the profit of private
interests',
it's
not even on the map.
Oh ****...here we go again. Do you and Harry read from the same manual?
Why do you try to link me with Harry? I don't know him and don't agree
with many
of the things he posts here, in fact I rarely read his posts. Do you think
there
are libby-rull terrorists hiding under your bed? Maybe they replaced the
Commies
after Reagan chased the pinkos out?
Every time those on the left are caught doing something shady, the
argument
changes to "well that's not as bad as...."
It matches the chorus from the right-wing whackos about how immoral
Clinton
is/was.
See? Another example of "well, that's not as bad as..." You just can't
help yourself.
And it certainly doesn't get you any points to dodge yet another
uncomfortable
issue.
Dodge what? I've been talking about an existing loophole which allows
foreign entities to skirt our campaign contribution laws...and you're trying
to argue that it's OK for Democrats to commit seditious acts because those
on the right did it too.
heh heh is that why BushCo is encouraging corporate flight to offshore
tax
shelters?
WTF are you talking about? The exodus of manufacturing jobs started
long
before Bush took office.
Yep. And it has sped up dramatically since 2001.
That's WTF I'm talking about.
Is that clear enough for you?
No. It's not clear. In fact, you hypocritically snipped a portion of my
post because you couldn't provide a decent rebuttal.
So, I'll say it again: "No new legislation has been passed in the past 3
years that would encourage corporate flight to offshore tax shelters." Bush
simply is not responsible.
So far he seems to be a record-setting campaign contribution
harvester.... a lean mean moneygrubbin' machine!
His money is raised domestically...acquired from people that actually
have
the constitutional right to vote for him.
And corporations, let's not forget them. BTW are you *sure* that 100% of
Bush's
campaign contributions come from U.S. backers?
No, I'm not sure. Are you *sure* that he's receiving foreign money through
organizations that can be described as the right wing answer to gropus like
moveon.org?
Bush & Cheney... the finest Executive Branch money can buy!
Should Dean win the Presidency, he'll owe more to guys like George Soros
than Cheney could ever owe to Halliburton.
|