Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Acceptable"? WTF?? Is it legal? Yes. For now. heh heh when will BushCo think up something really keen, like making it illegal to make a campaign contribution to the Democrat Party. That should cover the bases. BTW you are terrible at dodging questions that show you up. -10 pts. Or are you willing to answer the question about sedition, especially the parts about various seditious & treasonous right-wing actions & speeches? but on a moral scale including such quantifiables as 'starting a war & killing tens of thousands of people for the profit of private interests', it's not even on the map. Oh ****...here we go again. Do you and Harry read from the same manual? Why do you try to link me with Harry? I don't know him and don't agree with many of the things he posts here, in fact I rarely read his posts. Do you think there are libby-rull terrorists hiding under your bed? Maybe they replaced the Commies after Reagan chased the pinkos out? Every time those on the left are caught doing something shady, the argument changes to "well that's not as bad as...." It matches the chorus from the right-wing whackos about how immoral Clinton is/was. See? Another example of "well, that's not as bad as..." You just can't help yourself. And it certainly doesn't get you any points to dodge yet another uncomfortable issue. Dodge what? I've been talking about an existing loophole which allows foreign entities to skirt our campaign contribution laws...and you're trying to argue that it's OK for Democrats to commit seditious acts because those on the right did it too. heh heh is that why BushCo is encouraging corporate flight to offshore tax shelters? WTF are you talking about? The exodus of manufacturing jobs started long before Bush took office. Yep. And it has sped up dramatically since 2001. That's WTF I'm talking about. Is that clear enough for you? No. It's not clear. In fact, you hypocritically snipped a portion of my post because you couldn't provide a decent rebuttal. So, I'll say it again: "No new legislation has been passed in the past 3 years that would encourage corporate flight to offshore tax shelters." Bush simply is not responsible. So far he seems to be a record-setting campaign contribution harvester.... a lean mean moneygrubbin' machine! His money is raised domestically...acquired from people that actually have the constitutional right to vote for him. And corporations, let's not forget them. BTW are you *sure* that 100% of Bush's campaign contributions come from U.S. backers? No, I'm not sure. Are you *sure* that he's receiving foreign money through organizations that can be described as the right wing answer to gropus like moveon.org? Bush & Cheney... the finest Executive Branch money can buy! Should Dean win the Presidency, he'll owe more to guys like George Soros than Cheney could ever owe to Halliburton. |