"Nav" wrote in message

This ad hominem proves you've lost.

Being called silly is not an ad hominum... no more than a 'Bwhahahaha'
substainsiates an argument.


Why is this so difficult for you to understand? Let me explain it to you
even more simply. The light from the built in camera flash bounces off the
retina back to the camera lens when a person looks at the camera. Happens
every time - it's physics. If the person is not looking at the camera or
if their pupil is constricted then the effect gets smaller but any light
coming off the retina back into the camera is 'red eye'.

Boy... see I knew you had a clue as to what causes red-eye.... now what
measures would you take to negate this effect? Matter of fact how many
degrees of angle are required to remove the possibility of red-eye? Would a
deflector [ piece of white cardboard taped to deflect the 'built-in' flash]
have any effect? How would you compensate for this?

Professionals... Pah! I forgot more than either you or Bob ever knew about
photography!!.

CM