|
|
|
|
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:56:14 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:
John Gaquin wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
On 9 Sep 2004 06:52:53 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:
There was NO debt when Bush took over. None, nada, zilch. A balanced
budget.
At 09/30/1999, the national debt was $5,656,270,901,615.43.
Did Clinton pay it off in three months? I think not.
We've seen this several times before. B'ass can't quite grasp the
difference between the deficit and the national debt. It's fun,
though.
And, of course, in your crippled mind, there is no connection between
running a deficit and piling up the debt.
*Whose* crippled mind? Do you know where this came from?
_______________________________________
On 9 Sep 2004 06:52:53 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:
There was NO debt when Bush took over. None, nada, zilch. A balanced
budget.
Did bassie really say that there was no *debt*?
|