WaIIy wrote:
On 11 Nov 2003 04:12:03 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:
Oh, you know how it is, buddy. If JoeTechnician thinks that you are
even a tiny bit left leaning, and able to think for yourself, as
opposed to goose stepping to BushCo, then you are non-human to him.
Yes, it's stupidity, but it's there, non the less.
Godwin's Law /prov./ [Usenet] "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the
probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
There is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread
is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever
argument was in progress. Godwin's Law thus practically guarantees the
existence of an upper bound on thread length in those groups.
Wally: Godwin's Law is a canard; when it first was first posted, it was
a funny little piece of doggerel. The fact that you *rely* on it to help
you dispute opinions with which you disagree only goes to show what a
real dumfoch you are.
Here's a simple example for you: someone will liken some idea put in the
head of Bush, the brain-damaged imbecile in the White House, to
something that would have come out of the third reich. You and the rest
of the right-wing pond scum will then *deny* the validity of that posit,
ad nauseum, thus disproving that there is an "upper bound" on thread length.
There isn't a thought in your head worth a plugged nickel, Wally. How
can you live with that?
--
Email sent to
is never read.