| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
WaIIy wrote:
On 11 Nov 2003 04:12:03 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: Oh, you know how it is, buddy. If JoeTechnician thinks that you are even a tiny bit left leaning, and able to think for yourself, as opposed to goose stepping to BushCo, then you are non-human to him. Yes, it's stupidity, but it's there, non the less. Godwin's Law /prov./ [Usenet] "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one." There is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress. Godwin's Law thus practically guarantees the existence of an upper bound on thread length in those groups. Wally: Godwin's Law is a canard; when it first was first posted, it was a funny little piece of doggerel. The fact that you *rely* on it to help you dispute opinions with which you disagree only goes to show what a real dumfoch you are. Here's a simple example for you: someone will liken some idea put in the head of Bush, the brain-damaged imbecile in the White House, to something that would have come out of the third reich. You and the rest of the right-wing pond scum will then *deny* the validity of that posit, ad nauseum, thus disproving that there is an "upper bound" on thread length. There isn't a thought in your head worth a plugged nickel, Wally. How can you live with that? -- Email sent to is never read. |