-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 22 Nov 2003 21:32:57 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote:


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


Bush lied.


RB

The only thing Bush required, was Saddam's ongoing breach of the 1991
peace treaty, and Saddam's related noncompliance with UN resolution
after UN resolution, for twelve years. It was that noncompliance that
Bush had proof of--too much proof. The WMD would just be icing on the
cake--not needed for any honest observer of Saddam's brutal history to
justify a war, and likewise never enough for the rabid Bush-haters.
They'd just find another excuse to distrust America, and blame Bush.
Logic is beyond their grasp. France and Russia objected to the war for
the same reason that most third parties object--it conflicted with
their own interests. They had lucrative oil contracts with Saddam that
would be in question after his departure. The more I think about it,
the more I know that Bush will win reelection in a landslide next year.
Americans are willing to fight and die, and even pay billions for a
noble cause, and replacing Saddam (and his evil sons) with a democracy
is a noble cause. If democracy works in Iraq, it can spread in other
Middle-East countries from the grassroots up-not by new wars. That's
what the Muslim fundamentalists can't stand--personal freedom for the
masses--especially women. Muslim radical clerics, and especially the
dictators, hate personal freedom . What is it about freedom for Iraqis
that you don't like, Bob?

two wheels


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQA/AwUBP7/iK9CBA23eyf45EQLTCgCgmhsPAdNoJWI5wVyUZrg/iwK4ZxoAoP77
w9/WhqnJccHDkcnol4BW0C/d
=M5ng
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----