On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:21:11 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/17/16 4:02 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:38:00 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:


The 2nd Amendment is no protection against "despot leaders."


Why?

Harry thinks the Air Force would nuke us I guess. It is clear that
they are not that effective against a civilian insurgency.
When have we ever won one of those?
Even in the last war we won (WWII) we defeated the standing armies but
we had to make concessions to the civilian population to chill them
out. (we let the japanese keep the emperor, engaging him to end any
insurgency and we let the germans keep all the property they stole
from the jews ... and more, chilling out the nazi supporters.)



You and the fellow over-the-top 2nd Amenders here couldn't defeat a Cub
Scout pack armed with Daisy BB guns.

Yeah, that is what King George said