Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:21:11 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 6/17/16 4:02 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:38:00 -0500, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: The 2nd Amendment is no protection against "despot leaders." Why? Harry thinks the Air Force would nuke us I guess. It is clear that they are not that effective against a civilian insurgency. When have we ever won one of those? Even in the last war we won (WWII) we defeated the standing armies but we had to make concessions to the civilian population to chill them out. (we let the japanese keep the emperor, engaging him to end any insurgency and we let the germans keep all the property they stole from the jews ... and more, chilling out the nazi supporters.) You and the fellow over-the-top 2nd Amenders here couldn't defeat a Cub Scout pack armed with Daisy BB guns. Yeah, that is what King George said |