| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
|
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 00:06:15 GMT, rw
wrote: wrote: Spam from VoteNader.org? (Or naderexplore04.org) You may have received spam email recently that appears to come from our campaign, or be about our campaign -- perhaps the "From" and or "Reply-to" addresses look like they are coming from VoteNader.org. Or perhaps you have received a message that appears to come from an individual (if the address is real, the real owner probably did not send this email either) with suppressed recipients. Or maybe you received an email that appeared to come from yourself promoting our site. **** that egomaniac Ralph Nader and all the devil's spawn who supports him. He's already set this country back four years, and he's aiming at eight. The worst of it is, that I think _this_ message was the SPAM. I'd seen nothing before it. Hmmm. Reverse ploy by some idiot on his campaign staff? That'd be as dumb as the Minnesota guy who used his dead bosses' funeral to make a political speech. Lost his party the senatorial seat. -- rbc:vixen,Minnow Goddess,Willow Watcher,and all that sort of thing. Often taunted by trout. Only a fool would refuse to believe in luck. Only a damn fool would rely on it. http://www.visi.com/~cyli |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
wrote in message
The worst of it is, that I think _this_ message was the SPAM. I'd seen nothing before it. Hmmm. Reverse ploy by some idiot on his campaign staff? From what I've learned, this sort of thing is known as a "Joe Job". Not that I'm crazy about that. g Joe F. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
|
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
don't too much disagree with you but the post has nothing to do with Nader,
that's a front john "rw" wrote in message nk.net... wrote: Spam from VoteNader.org? (Or naderexplore04.org) You may have received spam email recently that appears to come from our campaign, or be about our campaign -- perhaps the "From" and or "Reply-to" addresses look like they are coming from VoteNader.org. Or perhaps you have received a message that appears to come from an individual (if the address is real, the real owner probably did not send this email either) with suppressed recipients. Or maybe you received an email that appeared to come from yourself promoting our site. **** that egomaniac Ralph Nader and all the devil's spawn who supports him. He's already set this country back four years, and he's aiming at eight. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
Bob in Idaho wrote:
Spoken like a truly arrogant Fascist. Bob C. Idahoan for Ralph Nader Supporting Ralph Nader in Idaho is a perfect example of futility and ineffectuality. Fortunately for those of us who are sane, your particular vote for Ralph, assuming he even makes it onto the ballot, won't make a damn bit of difference. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
Precisely! Votes cast for Ralph Nader have absolutely no affect on the
outcome of the race between the two main candidates, no matter where those votes were are cast. Bob C. Idahoan for Nader "rw" wrote in message ink.net... Bob in Idaho wrote: Spoken like a truly arrogant Fascist. Bob C. Idahoan for Ralph Nader Supporting Ralph Nader in Idaho is a perfect example of futility and ineffectuality. Fortunately for those of us who are sane, your particular vote for Ralph, assuming he even makes it onto the ballot, won't make a damn bit of difference. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
Bob in Idaho wrote:
Precisely! Votes cast for Ralph Nader have absolutely no affect on the outcome of the race between the two main candidates, no matter where those votes were are cast. How about, for example, Florida in 2000? -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Twelve percent of Florida Democrats (over 200,000) voted for Republican
George Bush" -San Francisco Chronicle, Nov. 9, 2000 The Greens received 97,488 votes and the votes cast for all other candidates and write-ins amounted to 40,579 --grand total of 138,067. So one could logically conclude from these figures that NO votes cast for Ralph Nader had any affect on the outcome. However, had registered Democrats trusted their parties choice, George Bush would likely be reading comic books at his Texas ranch rather than in the White House. If figures don't impress you, please, explain how you can conclude that votes not cast for Nader (or any of the other non-major candidates) automatically convert in to votes for Gore? Bob C. Idahoan for Nader "rw" wrote in message ink.net... Bob in Idaho wrote: Precisely! Votes cast for Ralph Nader have absolutely no affect on the outcome of the race between the two main candidates, no matter where those votes were are cast. How about, for example, Florida in 2000? -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 02:19:12 GMT, "Bob C in Idaho"
wrote: "Twelve percent of Florida Democrats (over 200,000) voted for Republican George Bush" -San Francisco Chronicle, Nov. 9, 2000 The Greens received 97,488 votes and the votes cast for all other candidates and write-ins amounted to 40,579 --grand total of 138,067. So one could logically conclude from these figures that NO votes cast for Ralph Nader had any affect on the outcome. However, had registered Democrats trusted their parties choice, George Bush would likely be reading comic books at his Texas ranch rather than in the White House. If figures don't impress you, please, explain how you can conclude that votes not cast for Nader (or any of the other non-major candidates) automatically convert in to votes for Gore? Bob C. Idahoan for Nader "rw" wrote in message link.net... Bob in Idaho wrote: Precisely! Votes cast for Ralph Nader have absolutely no affect on the outcome of the race between the two main candidates, no matter where those votes were are cast. How about, for example, Florida in 2000? -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. Absolutely illogical. If only 1000 Naderites had voted for Gore instead of Ralf, then we wouldn't have the assholes we currently have in control of the Whitehouse. Perhaps other assholes but certainly not the ones there now. In the system we have now, with no run off elections between the two top vote getters third parties will always have the effect of tilting the election one way or another. g.c. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
If only 1000 of the 200,000 Democrats hadn't voted for Bush, your argument
would have some relevance within the context of the preceding post. Bob C Idahoan for Nader "George Cleveland" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 02:19:12 GMT, "Bob C in Idaho" wrote: "Twelve percent of Florida Democrats (over 200,000) voted for Republican George Bush" -San Francisco Chronicle, Nov. 9, 2000 The Greens received 97,488 votes and the votes cast for all other candidates and write-ins amounted to 40,579 --grand total of 138,067. So one could logically conclude from these figures that NO votes cast for Ralph Nader had any affect on the outcome. However, had registered Democrats trusted their parties choice, George Bush would likely be reading comic books at his Texas ranch rather than in the White House. If figures don't impress you, please, explain how you can conclude that votes not cast for Nader (or any of the other non-major candidates) automatically convert in to votes for Gore? Bob C. Idahoan for Nader "rw" wrote in message link.net... Bob in Idaho wrote: Precisely! Votes cast for Ralph Nader have absolutely no affect on the outcome of the race between the two main candidates, no matter where those votes were are cast. How about, for example, Florida in 2000? -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. Absolutely illogical. If only 1000 Naderites had voted for Gore instead of Ralf, then we wouldn't have the assholes we currently have in control of the Whitehouse. Perhaps other assholes but certainly not the ones there now. In the system we have now, with no run off elections between the two top vote getters third parties will always have the effect of tilting the election one way or another. g.c. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 02:59:27 GMT, "Bob C in Idaho"
wrote: If only 1000 of the 200,000 Democrats hadn't voted for Bush, your argument would have some relevance within the context of the preceding post. Bob C Idahoan for Nader You're equivocating. g.c. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
Fix the election System, Don't Blame Nader
From http://www.systemsthinker.com/writin...amenader.shtml The "spoiler" issue is actually a flaw in our election system, and we don't have to put up with it. We can fix that problem. We are working to do just that in Ferndale, Michigan through a system called Instant Runoff Voting. It is used all over the world, is endorsed by John McCain, Howard Dean, and USA Today, and would make sure there are never spoilers again in American elections. For more information visit, http://www.firv.org and http://www.fairvote.org/irv Democrats and Republicans need to stop complaining about third parties "spoiling" elections unless they are willing to support Instant Runoff Voting to ensure it never happens again. If they won't support this common sense reform, then there is really no alternative to third parties but to continue having their voices heard by running anyways. Imagine if as much energy was put into fixing the fundamental problem in the election system as is put towards discouraging and vilifying third party candidates who really represent the victims of the system enforced by the two major parties themselves. Also See: http://www.firv.org/pressreleases/naderirvpr22204.html Detroit Free Press article in support of IRV due to Nader: http://www.freep.com/news/politics/d...5_20040225.htm Oakland Press article in support of IRV due to Nader: http://www.fairvote.org/editorials/oakland.htm For more of Ferndale for Instant Runoff Voting In The News see http://www.firv.org/inthenews.html George Cleveland wrote in message . .. On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 02:59:27 GMT, "Bob C in Idaho" wrote: If only 1000 of the 200,000 Democrats hadn't voted for Bush, your argument would have some relevance within the context of the preceding post. Bob C Idahoan for Nader You're equivocating. g.c. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
Instant runoff sounds handy for those mornings on the Canyon when your boat
is stranded on the beach, or when the slot in Grim Reaper on the Lochsa is too narrow for my boat to thread through . . . I'd vote for that. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
How is it that I am "equivocating," when registered voters of the Democratic
Party couldn't bring themselves to vote for their own parties choice for POTUSA If you wish to blame some individuals/entities for G.W. Bush's current residence, look no further than the Democratic Party and its disillusioned members, but don't blame other parties nor their supporters for the short-comings of the Democratic Party. You anti-Nader folks might want to take a civics refresher course or two. Last check, our political system was still a multi-party system. Thus, people are free to vote for the candidate of their choosing, even if that candidate isn't the one that you would like to see win the office of POTUSA or dog catcher for that matter. Sour grapes are not very tasty nor are they a convincing political argument. Bob C. Idahoan for Nader "George Cleveland" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 02:59:27 GMT, "Bob C in Idaho" wrote: If only 1000 of the 200,000 Democrats hadn't voted for Bush, your argument would have some relevance within the context of the preceding post. Bob C Idahoan for Nader You're equivocating. g.c. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
This poster believes that casting a vote for a major party candidate is
futile. Meanwhile, he spends his time posting political drivel to a paddling newsgroup. Those Nader people really have their priorities straight, don't they? nielsdt "Bob in Idaho" wrote in message ... Precisely! Votes cast for Ralph Nader have absolutely no affect on the outcome of the race between the two main candidates, no matter where those votes were are cast. Bob C. Idahoan for Nader "rw" wrote in message ink.net... Bob in Idaho wrote: Spoken like a truly arrogant Fascist. Bob C. Idahoan for Ralph Nader Supporting Ralph Nader in Idaho is a perfect example of futility and ineffectuality. Fortunately for those of us who are sane, your particular vote for Ralph, assuming he even makes it onto the ballot, won't make a damn bit of difference. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
In article ,
Howard wrote: Fix the election System, Don't Blame Nader From http://www.systemsthinker.com/writin...amenader.shtml The "spoiler" issue is actually a flaw in our election system, and we don't have to put up with it. We can fix that problem. We are working to do just that in Ferndale, Michigan through a system called Instant Runoff Voting. It is used all over the world, is endorsed by John McCain, Howard Dean, and USA Today, and would make sure there are never spoilers again in American elections. For more information visit, http://www.firv.org and http://www.fairvote.org/irv Well, when you get right down to it, why not just require that everybody vote for A or B. Simply disallow 3rd party votes, and you won't need "runoffs". Note that much of the (civilized) world has made election participation mandatory, so it is a small step from there to making it mandatory that you vote for one or other of the majors. And, what does this have to do with OKBridge? |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
Bob in Idaho wrote:
How is it that I am "equivocating," when registered voters of the Democratic Party couldn't bring themselves to vote for their own parties choice for POTUSA You are equivocating because there is ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT that if Nader hadn't run in 2000, then Gore would be President today. Case closed. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"rw" wrote in message nk.net... Bob in Idaho wrote: How is it that I am "equivocating," when registered voters of the Democratic Party couldn't bring themselves to vote for their own parties choice for POTUSA You are equivocating because there is ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT that if Nader hadn't run in 2000, then Gore would be President today. Case closed. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. yep. directed verdict for the plaintiff, rw. wayno (hell, this judge stuff is *easy*) |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
Well since you put it that way, THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT that if ALL
the Democrats in Florida had voted for Gore in 2000, Gore would be President today! Another case closed. Your "so-called" argument makes about as much sense as you telling me that I should plant only the vegetables that you prefer, in a garden that I am planting for myself. Except in your own mind, you have totally failed to prove your case against Nader. According to your logic, you might as well take a shot at the Reform Party which garnered 17,484 votes in Florida or the Libertarian Party which garnered 16,415 votes in Florida. Either of those parties candidates votes could also have pushed Gore over the top, well except for one tiny little factor, the people who voted for those candidates didn't vote for Gore either! They voted for the candidate of their choice, and it wasn't Al Gore. You might as well say that George W. Bush cost Al Gore the election, since he was able to convince Democrats to vote for him who wouldn't otherwise have voted for him, if he hadn't run for the office of POTUSA. Face it fella, until there is a constitutional amendment passed making our political system a two party system, you'll just have to live with the fact that not everyone agrees with the Democrat/Republican Party agendas. It's politics in America, get used to it. One question though: If by chance Ralph Nader were to pull out this time around, which parties candidate are you going to blame if George W. Bush wins again? Bob C. Idahoan for Nader "rw" wrote in message nk.net... Bob in Idaho wrote: How is it that I am "equivocating," when registered voters of the Democratic Party couldn't bring themselves to vote for their own parties choice for POTUSA You are equivocating because there is ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT that if Nader hadn't run in 2000, then Gore would be President today. Case closed. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
Bob in Idaho wrote:
Your "so-called" argument makes about as much sense as you telling me that I should plant only the vegetables that you prefer, in a garden that I am planting for myself. I not saying that Nader doesn't have a right to run for President, and that you and your ilk don't have a right to vote for him. Of course you do. I'm saying that it's STUPID! If Nader hadn't run in 2000, 649 American servicemen (and counting) wouldn't have died in Iraq, thousands more wouldn't have been seriously wounded, and we wouldn't be stuck in a deadly, no-win quagmire, on the brink of civil war, abandoned by nearly all of our allies. BTW, just to be fair, we also wouldn't have found any weapons of mass destruction. (I'd put a smiley here, but somehow it doesn't seem appropriate.) -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob in Idaho" wrote in message .. . Well since you put it that way, THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT that if ALL the Democrats in Florida had voted for Gore in 2000, Gore would be President today! Another case closed. Your "so-called" argument makes about as much sense as you telling me that I should plant only the vegetables that you prefer, in a garden that I am planting for myself. Except in your own mind, you have totally failed to prove your case against Nader. According to your logic, you might as well take a shot at the Reform Party which garnered 17,484 votes in Florida or the Libertarian Party which garnered 16,415 votes in Florida. Either of those parties candidates votes could also have pushed Gore over the top, well except for one tiny little factor, the people who voted for those candidates didn't vote for Gore either! They voted for the candidate of their choice, and it wasn't Al Gore. You might as well say that George W. Bush cost Al Gore the election, since he was able to convince Democrats to vote for him who wouldn't otherwise have voted for him, if he hadn't run for the office of POTUSA. Face it fella, until there is a constitutional amendment passed making our political system a two party system, you'll just have to live with the fact that not everyone agrees with the Democrat/Republican Party agendas. It's politics in America, get used to it. One question though: If by chance Ralph Nader were to pull out this time around, which parties candidate are you going to blame if George W. Bush wins again? Bob C. Idahoan for Nader O.k., this has gone on long enough. I was hoping that the whole mess would have blown over by now but, obviously, this is not the case. It's MY fault. Yes, it's true. You see, I lived in Florida back in 1971. One night (in June, I think it was) I conceived a brilliant reform plan that would forever change the face of American politics and make it impossible for a fool of any size, shape, color, sexual orientation, or political philosophy (however badly pretended) to be elected to any national office. I'd actually initiated the plan, which would have required only a few more hours of careful nurturing before acquiring an unstoppable momentum of its own, when a couple of buddies suggested we all go out for a couple of drinks. Well, I was tired and overwrought......I acceded. Um.....one thing led to another and we all got stinking drunk.....woke up somewhere on South Beach about three o'clock the next afternoon. The plan faltered......I never could remember exactly what it was. I accept full responsibility for my actions. I'm sorry. :( Wolfgang who would like a shot of redemption to go with his catharsis, please. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
Could you all please stop cross posting! I don't where this discussion
belongs to , but please, take it off rec.arts.movies.production.sound Very much appreciated, thanks, Karl On 4/10/04 1:10 PM, in article , "Wolfgang" wrote: "Bob in Idaho" wrote in message .. . Well since you put it that way, THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT that if ALL the Democrats in Florida had voted for Gore in 2000, Gore would be President today! Another case closed. Your "so-called" argument makes about as much sense as you telling me that I should plant only the vegetables that you prefer, in a garden that I am planting for myself. Except in your own mind, you have totally failed to prove your case against Nader. According to your logic, you might as well take a shot at the Reform Party which garnered 17,484 votes in Florida or the Libertarian Party which garnered 16,415 votes in Florida. Either of those parties candidates votes could also have pushed Gore over the top, well except for one tiny little factor, the people who voted for those candidates didn't vote for Gore either! They voted for the candidate of their choice, and it wasn't Al Gore. You might as well say that George W. Bush cost Al Gore the election, since he was able to convince Democrats to vote for him who wouldn't otherwise have voted for him, if he hadn't run for the office of POTUSA. Face it fella, until there is a constitutional amendment passed making our political system a two party system, you'll just have to live with the fact that not everyone agrees with the Democrat/Republican Party agendas. It's politics in America, get used to it. One question though: If by chance Ralph Nader were to pull out this time around, which parties candidate are you going to blame if George W. Bush wins again? Bob C. Idahoan for Nader O.k., this has gone on long enough. I was hoping that the whole mess would have blown over by now but, obviously, this is not the case. It's MY fault. Yes, it's true. You see, I lived in Florida back in 1971. One night (in June, I think it was) I conceived a brilliant reform plan that would forever change the face of American politics and make it impossible for a fool of any size, shape, color, sexual orientation, or political philosophy (however badly pretended) to be elected to any national office. I'd actually initiated the plan, which would have required only a few more hours of careful nurturing before acquiring an unstoppable momentum of its own, when a couple of buddies suggested we all go out for a couple of drinks. Well, I was tired and overwrought......I acceded. Um.....one thing led to another and we all got stinking drunk.....woke up somewhere on South Beach about three o'clock the next afternoon. The plan faltered......I never could remember exactly what it was. I accept full responsibility for my actions. I'm sorry. :( Wolfgang who would like a shot of redemption to go with his catharsis, please. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob in Idaho" schrieb im Newsbeitrag .. . So how do you feel about WF lines? MC |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
Well, now we've taken a turn for the worse.
That Mr. Nader decided to run for political office is no more STUPID than the decision of any other political candidate to do the same. Thus, if it is not STUPID for Mr. Nader to run for office, it follows that it wouldn't be STUPID to vote for him anymore than it would be STUPID to vote for ANY OTHER CANDIDATE. I certainly hope the sky doesn't fall, the Anti-Christ doesn't rise, or you don't find a boil on your arse. Heaven knows Mr. Nader wouldn't want to be blamed for any of that, in addition to the preposterous load that you just heaped upon him. My ilk? Hmm, my ilk? Ok, my ilk and I are content that Mr. Nader is in no way responsible for the War, the inevitable dead and wounded that naturally follow such sad affairs, the reiterated aforementioned and an untenable situation for which an Iraqi intifada is likely to occur, and for which we will lose all hope of future international respect and backing. I certainly hope you have learned a valuable lesson and will attempt to be a bit more thoughtful in you future deliberations, be they political or otherwise. HTH'd Bob C. Idahoan for Nader "rw" wrote in message ink.net... Bob in Idaho wrote: Your "so-called" argument makes about as much sense as you telling me that I should plant only the vegetables that you prefer, in a garden that I am planting for myself. I not saying that Nader doesn't have a right to run for President, and that you and your ilk don't have a right to vote for him. Of course you do. I'm saying that it's STUPID! If Nader hadn't run in 2000, 649 American servicemen (and counting) wouldn't have died in Iraq, thousands more wouldn't have been seriously wounded, and we wouldn't be stuck in a deadly, no-win quagmire, on the brink of civil war, abandoned by nearly all of our allies. BTW, just to be fair, we also wouldn't have found any weapons of mass destruction. (I'd put a smiley here, but somehow it doesn't seem appropriate.) -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
I have felt about WF lines a time or two in my life, but I much prefer
casting a DT line. And you? Bob C. Idahoan for Nader "Mike Connor" wrote in message ... "Bob in Idaho" schrieb im Newsbeitrag .. . So how do you feel about WF lines? MC |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 18:41:39 -0400, "Bob in Idaho" wrote:
Well, now we've taken a turn for the worse. That Mr. Nader decided to run for political office is no more STUPID than the decision of any other political candidate to do the same. Thus, if it is not STUPID for Mr. Nader to run for office, it follows that it wouldn't be STUPID to vote for him anymore than it would be STUPID to vote for ANY OTHER CANDIDATE. I certainly hope the sky doesn't fall, the Anti-Christ doesn't rise, or you don't find a boil on your arse. Heaven knows Mr. Nader wouldn't want to be blamed for any of that, in addition to the preposterous load that you just heaped upon him. My ilk? Hmm, my ilk? Ok, my ilk and I are content that Mr. Nader is in no way responsible for the War, the inevitable dead and wounded that naturally follow such sad affairs, the reiterated aforementioned and an untenable situation for which an Iraqi intifada is likely to occur, and for which we will lose all hope of future international respect and backing. I certainly hope you have learned a valuable lesson and will attempt to be a bit more thoughtful in you future deliberations, be they political or otherwise. HTH'd Bob C. Idahoan for Nader Meanwhile, somewhere in Texas there's a village that has lost its idiot... |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
So, what do I receive, punitive or compensatory damages?
Bob C. Idahoan for Nader "Wayne Harrison" wrote in message om... "rw" wrote in message nk.net... Bob in Idaho wrote: How is it that I am "equivocating," when registered voters of the Democratic Party couldn't bring themselves to vote for their own parties choice for POTUSA You are equivocating because there is ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT that if Nader hadn't run in 2000, then Gore would be President today. Case closed. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. yep. directed verdict for the plaintiff, rw. wayno (hell, this judge stuff is *easy*) |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"daytripper" wrote in message ... Meanwhile, somewhere in Texas there's a village that has lost its idiot... Blatant fear-mongering. Wolfgang who knows that most villages keep an ample stock of spares. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob in Idaho" wrote in message .. . So, what do I receive, punitive or compensatory damages? treble damages awarded against you: failure to understand that the verdict was rendered *against* you; compensatory damages against you in rw's counterclaim; punitive damages for filing a ridiculous claim; and treble damages, just because it ought to be that bad. a. wayne harrison, j. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org (CROSS POSTING)
Hey guys...while I respect your right to discuss this issue, no one is
participating in your discussion from the rec.arts.movies.production.sound newsgroup. Can I ask that you direct your posts to the newsgroup you are reading them in and stop the senseless crossposting to newsgroups that choose not to discuss politics. Thanks! "Bob in Idaho" wrote in message .. . I have felt about WF lines a time or two in my life, but I much prefer casting a DT line. And you? Bob C. Idahoan for Nader "Mike Connor" wrote in message ... "Bob in Idaho" schrieb im Newsbeitrag .. . So how do you feel about WF lines? MC |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
Hah, a kangaroo court. Yes, I should have known, as the triple damages are
so similar to the number of Democrats that voted against Al Gore and for George W. Bush in Florida compared to the number of votes that Ralph Nader received, the fact that every third-party candidate received enough votes to cost Al Gore the election, and the fact that Florida wouldn't even have been a factor in the outcome, if only Al Gore had won his home state. Fine wines may become better with time, but sour grape only become putrid. I'm afraid that you gentlemen couldn't make a decent case utilizing mahogany and teak. Bob C. Idahoan for Nader "Wayne Harrison" wrote in message m... "Bob in Idaho" wrote in message .. . So, what do I receive, punitive or compensatory damages? treble damages awarded against you: failure to understand that the verdict was rendered *against* you; compensatory damages against you in rw's counterclaim; punitive damages for filing a ridiculous claim; and treble damages, just because it ought to be that bad. a. wayne harrison, j. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
Bob in Idaho wrote:
My ilk? Hmm, my ilk? Ok, my ilk and I are content that Mr. Nader is in no way responsible for the War, the inevitable dead and wounded that naturally follow such sad affairs, the reiterated aforementioned and an untenable situation for which an Iraqi intifada is likely to occur, and for which we will lose all hope of future international respect and backing. If Nader hadn't run, it wouldn't have happened. Q.E.D. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"rw" wrote in message
ink.net... Bob in Idaho wrote: My ilk? Hmm, my ilk? Ok, my ilk and I are content that Mr. Nader is in no way responsible for the War, the inevitable dead and wounded that naturally follow such sad affairs, the reiterated aforementioned and an untenable situation for which an Iraqi intifada is likely to occur, and for which we will lose all hope of future international respect and backing. If Nader hadn't run, it wouldn't have happened. Q.E.D. I don't get the point of this thread. If Nader's running caused President Bush to be elected, then he deserves to get *credit*, right? Mmbridge |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
Mmbridge wrote:
If Nader's running caused President Bush to be elected, then he deserves to get *credit*, right? That's a valid point of view. (Funny, too.) If Nader had the guts and honesty to take credit, I'd be happy. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
At his last press conference, what microphone did Ralph use? John B. Bob in Idaho wrote: I have felt about WF lines a time or two in my life, but I much prefer casting a DT line. And you? Bob C. Idahoan for Nader "Mike Connor" wrote in message ... "Bob in Idaho" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... So how do you feel about WF lines? MC |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
Hey guys...before you reply to the next message in this thread please remove
rec.audio.movies.production.sound from the list of newsgroups you are replying to. None of our newsgroup members have contributed to your thread and we'd all like to see it disappear from our group. As you can see I've already removed it from this post...please do the same from your replies to other messages in this thread. By all means have a great discussion...but please don't cross post. thanks! "Bob C in Idaho" wrote in message nk.net... Hah, a kangaroo court. Yes, I should have known, as the triple damages are so similar to the number of Democrats that voted against Al Gore and for George W. Bush in Florida compared to the number of votes that Ralph Nader received, the fact that every third-party candidate received enough votes to cost Al Gore the election, and the fact that Florida wouldn't even have been a factor in the outcome, if only Al Gore had won his home state. Fine wines may become better with time, but sour grape only become putrid. I'm afraid that you gentlemen couldn't make a decent case utilizing mahogany and teak. Bob C. Idahoan for Nader "Wayne Harrison" wrote in message m... "Bob in Idaho" wrote in message .. . So, what do I receive, punitive or compensatory damages? treble damages awarded against you: failure to understand that the verdict was rendered *against* you; compensatory damages against you in rw's counterclaim; punitive damages for filing a ridiculous claim; and treble damages, just because it ought to be that bad. a. wayne harrison, j. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
Tell ya one thing, the Nader organization has gotten more publicity out of
this supposed spam than they did all the last election season. |
Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:23 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com