donquijote1954 wrote:

"And what of the dolphin who kills the shark, yet eats his fill of
sardines? The problem with sardines is that they are designed to be
eaten....."

See what I mean? Typical Conservative: the sardines are designed to be
eaten, probably designed by God...

Has it ever crossed your mind that they are living creatures, no worse
than sharks? Why then we don't pick on them? They are ugly for one...

Well man, I got news for you, sardines are pretty and they have the
right to cooperate to survive. By the way, dolphins (save for a few)
belong with the little fish because they are smart and also cute.

I think there's another Law of the Jungle that says (or ought to say)
SURVIVAL OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL.

And I ought to be rich, and you ought to be more intelligent.

But that's the way the world works.

--
Your ridiculous little opinion has been noted.

My diesel truck has been modified to run on an environmentally friendly
mixture of clean burning Caribou fat and whale oil.

"Tolerance is the virtue of a man without convictions"
G.K. Chesterton

dazed and confuzzed wrote:
I think there's another Law of the Jungle that says (or ought to say)
SURVIVAL OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL.

And I ought to be rich, and you ought to be more intelligent.

But that's the way the world works.


And the shark ought to be less hungry.

I mean, this is NOT about survival for the predator, but just a bulimic
shark.