Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25-Aug-2004, Jeff Potter wrote:
Anyway, it seems like my 230 Lendl is pretty nice, maybe a tad long. I have a 220 Streuer that I'm borrowing that seems short. But I really haven't been seakayak paddling that much. I'm 6'1" with 30-31" torso. My boat has a 20" beam Technically, you don't size the paddle, you size the shaft. If the shaft is the right length, it doesn't matter what size blades you put on, they'll still end up under water. One 225 cm paddle could be the same for you as a 215 with different blades. Lendal's web site had some info on sizing shafts once upon a time - check it and see if it still does. I use a 220 Lendal Archipelago in a kayak with a low deck and 22" beam. I'm 5'11" and find it a tad long - I kinda wish I got a 215. I'd guess that you'd be comfortable with a 220 or even 215. The best advice is try before you buy. Try the same paddle you want, not some other paddle with the same overall length. If you're keen on speed, why not get a wing paddle? - you can also use it for touring or use the Lendal and keep the wing as a spare. BTW - I think they size wings a tad shorter, but I'm not sure. Mike |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael Daly" wrote in message ...
[ ] Technically, you don't size the paddle, you size the shaft. If the shaft is the right length, it doesn't matter what size blades you put on, they'll still end up under water. One 225 cm paddle could be the same for you as a 215 with different blades. I'm terrible with logic. Is the idea to stay away from paddles and shafts that are too short? Everyone talks about being sure to bury the complete blade in the water, then they seem to be thinking paddles are too long and moving to shorter paddles---you're not the only place I've seen people wish for shorter. But it seems to me that as you go shorter that is where you risk not being able to get the whole blade in the water. A longer paddle easily puts the whole thing down there. The worry then seems to me that you're putting TOO MUCH paddle in the water. That's what longer does, as far as I can tell. Oh well. I just have a chance for a halfprice paddle, limited selection. I figure I should have a take down spare. I don't have time to test on water. I just tried my various paddles sitting in the boat in the yard. The 230 Lendl feels best--very light too. It has a much longer shaft, somewhat longer overall, shorter blades than the two 220's I have. The 220 Struer and new Harmony two-part I just got both seem too short offhand and the 220 seemed too short in the water. But even when I did get to do some paddling and water-testing it wasn't that much, just a couple hours. So maybe I'm somehow being biased by my old fla****er ways and should just suck it up and go a little shorter for the seakayak. As I said, I'm a terrible shopper and rarely buy anything much less something new even for halfprice. I'd bought the 220 and was thinking I should maybe return it for the 230. I recall liking that length the last time I paddled, but maybe more paddling would reveal it to be a bit long. I just talked to a top racer pal and we're similar size and he uses 222 (maye a wing?). Whew! I'll just let it ride. The goofy thing is that luck has me driving again by the boat store today---I usually only get that way a few times a year. Oh well! Thanks for the tips. I'll look for Lendl's site. --JP |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
Ignorant Dupes | ASA |