| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gene,
I gave up on feathered paddles years ago and still fail to see the benefit. I am much more comfortable with an unfeathered paddle, though if the blade were really narrow, I guess it would not matter much. I would say that switching back and forth is a mistake, at least for me. My muscle memory is such that I cannot now roll with a feathered paddle without taking a long time to consider the process and a couple of uncomfortable near failures. Your mileage may vary. Dowd (I believe it was he) wrote that only in a direct headwind does a feathered paddle produce any advantage. I switched while paddling in a storm with the wind on my beam, and I never went back. Rick .. "Gene Cosloy" wrote in message om... I'm quite comfortable with a 60 degree feathered paddle and understand the advantages in windy situations. However I've recently begun to learn and practice Braces. would't the learning curve be quicker in learning to brace quickly either side if you used an unfeathered paddle? Same goes for learning to roll? I really don't have to think about feathering with my index hand since the forward stroke has become second nature or intuitive due to repetion. Bracing, or rolling however is not yet intuitive and during practive I forgot to twist my wrist on the index side and the brace failed by having the paddle dive into the water with me following. I know the stock answer will be with practice, the proper indexing will also become intuitive during bracing /rolling. My point is that while I may devote whole days to the forward stroke, I can only afford an hour or so once a week to practice. Does it not make more sense to switch to an unfeathered paddle for all strokes and trade off the few times wind becomes a severe issue Gene |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rick wrote: Gene, Dowd (I believe it was he) wrote that only in a direct headwind does a feathered paddle produce any advantage. Defintely words of wisdom and absolutely correct. When you consider that when paddling into a headwind, the paddler is in the strongest, most stable position, the difference that a feathered paddle makes is not that great. Also, feather angles less than 90 degrees will cause the paddle to lift or dive in a headwind. Overall, I found feathering to be an overall disadvantage. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Brian Nystrom wrote:
Dowd (I believe it was he) wrote that only in a direct headwind does a feathered paddle produce any advantage. Defintely words of wisdom and absolutely correct. When you consider that when paddling into a headwind, the paddler is in the strongest, most stable position, the difference that a feathered paddle makes is not that great. Also, feather angles less than 90 degrees will cause the paddle to lift or dive in a headwind. Overall, I found feathering to be an overall disadvantage. Some people think a feathered paddle (45-60 degrees) feels more natural during the paddle stroke, and blades are always in a nearly ideal position for offside bracing. Feathered paddles can be shorter (due to different technique used) and therefore lighter. It's individual preference. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Who else has tried paddling with an adjustable feather paddle unlocked? When I
did it (Seven 2 paddle) I found 22 degrees to be my natural feather. I normally paddle with a 218cm, unfeathered, with a pretty vertical stroke. Brian B |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bill Tuthill wrote: Brian Nystrom wrote: Dowd (I believe it was he) wrote that only in a direct headwind does a feathered paddle produce any advantage. Defintely words of wisdom and absolutely correct. When you consider that when paddling into a headwind, the paddler is in the strongest, most stable position, the difference that a feathered paddle makes is not that great. Also, feather angles less than 90 degrees will cause the paddle to lift or dive in a headwind. Overall, I found feathering to be a disadvantage. Some people think a feathered paddle (45-60 degrees) feels more natural during the paddle stroke, and blades are always in a nearly ideal position for offside bracing. If you think about it, what could be more natural than a paddle that's perfectly symmetric? The motion is identical from one side to the other. By definition, you MUST do something asymmetric in order to feather a paddle. Proper feathering technique must be taught, but anyone can use an unfeathered paddle with little or no instruction. Feathered paddles can be shorter (due to different technique used) and therefore lighter. How do you figure that? There's no difference in technique that would require a different length paddle, one way or the other. You seem to be assuming that there's a difference in paddle placement, paddle angle, torso rotation, etc. when there isn't. It's individual preference. True. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Brian Nystrom wrote:
Feathered paddles can be shorter (due to different technique used) and therefore lighter. How do you figure that? There's no difference in technique that would require a different length paddle, one way or the other. You seem to be assuming that there's a difference in paddle placement, paddle angle, torso rotation, etc. when there isn't. Hard to describe in words, without a paddle in hand. With unfeathered blades, your two hands have a paddling motion in two parallel circles, like cranking two old Model-T starters. With feathered blades, your shoulders get involved in the strokes and (with proper personal angle) the wrists and forearms stay mostly stationary with respect to the paddle. Upper-arm movement substitutes for a certain amount (10cm?) of paddle length. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 15-Jun-2004, Bill Tuthill wrote:
With unfeathered blades, your two hands have a paddling motion in two parallel circles, like cranking two old Model-T starters. With feathered blades, your shoulders get involved in the strokes and (with proper personal angle) the wrists and forearms stay mostly stationary with respect to the paddle. Upper-arm movement substitutes for a certain amount (10cm?) of paddle length I don't see why you have this difference. I use the same technique (closest to your second description) whether feathered or not. The former technique is what I tell folks to stop doing and the latter is what they should do. Mike |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Daly wrote: On 15-Jun-2004, Bill Tuthill wrote: With unfeathered blades, your two hands have a paddling motion in two parallel circles, like cranking two old Model-T starters. With feathered blades, your shoulders get involved in the strokes and (with proper personal angle) the wrists and forearms stay mostly stationary with respect to the paddle. Upper-arm movement substitutes for a certain amount (10cm?) of paddle length This is a common misconception, typically propagated by proponents of feathered paddling. It's nonsense. There is nothing about paddling unfeathered that forces this kind of difference in technique. I don't see why you have this difference. I use the same technique (closest to your second description) whether feathered or not. The former technique is what I tell folks to stop doing and the latter is what they should do. Exactly. There is no difference in proper technique, whether the paddle is feathered or not. Placement is placement. Torso rotation is torso rotation. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
| rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
| rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
| rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
| rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||