Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There isn't enough information to make any conclusion. If 90% of kyakers wear PFDs
and 50% of the fatalities were wearing a PFD, then that may be significant, but if only 50% of kyakers wear PFDs then one might question the effectivness of PFDs. (One wonders what was the status of the other 6%?) Of course one would need some additional supporting data in either case. It is kind of difficult to comprehend the set of circumstances that on average would make wearing a PFD more dangerous than not. Ki Ayker wrote: The real issue here? Personal freedom folks? Oh really? I do not consider myself to be a "personal freedom" zealot. Instead I see myself as a seeker of the truth. I have stated previously that pfd's cannot be compared to automobile seatbelts or motorcycle helmets. Both have been shown beyond any reasonable doubt to make a significant contribution towards safety on the road. But since you insist on lumping pfd's into the equation then I would very much appreciate it if you could state your sources which show the pfd to be of equal effectiveness to the automobile seatbelt or the motorcycle helmet. Ulli mentioned the report released by the American Canoe Association entitled, Critical Judgment, Understanding and Preventing Canoe and Kayak Fatalities." Although I believe they have taken some liberties with some of their conclusions, let us nonetheless take a quick peek at that report, shall we? On page 17 it is reported that; "Operator inexperience or inattention and hazardous water or weather by themselves, or combined with other factors, were the major causes of canoe and kayak fatalities. These factors accounted for 57% of all canoeing fatalities, and for 90% of all kayaking fatalities." Hmmm, no mention of a pfd there. Then on page 18 is a chart which shows that in the years from 1996 to 2000, 50% of the kayaking fatalities WERE WEARING PFD's, while 44% were not! This hardly presents a startling picture of the effectiveness of pfd's in kayaking. Yet so many of you insist that pfd's are the answer and anyone who paddles a kayak without wearing one should be punished! Why? No, really, I would like to know. Why? Since you people are so fervently adamant about pfd's then I'm certain your opinions must be based on some pretty substantial evidence which somehow I managed to overlook. So please enlighten me! I'm all ears. Scott So.Cal. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NTSB, August 25, "Mandatory" PFD | General | |||
PFD Statistics and Mandatory-Wear requirment proposal | General |