Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
PFD Statistics and Mandatory-Wear requirment proposal
magoo_ns wrote:
A tough, tough issue. Someone posted that there are no arguments against seat belts. I lost a friend, burned alive in a car while hanging upside down from his seat belt which he could not get undone. He might argue that point if he could. Tough break for your friend. My sympathies. He spun the wheel and ended up in the 1% of accidents that result in fires and the tiny % of seatbelts that won't release. If he hadn't been wearing the seatbelt he might have been killed outright or rendered unconscious by the impact, which in a sad way, would have been better. Another friend lost his brother in a single motorcycle accident. The Bell full-face he was wearing broke his neck when he landed in the ditch and he suffocated by the side of the road. His family doctor made the mistake of telling this to my friend, who had given his brother that helmet as a birthday gift. He might be inclined to argue for choice also. The impact with the ground broke his neck, not the helmet. I haven't seen many family doctors who are also accident scene investigation specialists, so I'd say the old doc is just incredibly insensitive at best. That said, I ALWYAS wear my helmet when riding, ALWAYS wear my seatbelt when driving, and ALWAYS wear my pfd when paddling. I've seen and heard about too many deaths that prove the rule rather than the exception. Me, too. Betting your life against high odds is, IMO, foolish. -- Steve Cramer Athens, GA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NTSB, August 25, "Mandatory" PFD | General | |||
PFD Statistics and Mandatory-Wear requirment proposal | General |